IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C) No. 22342 of 2007(I)
1. NITTIN P.JOSEPH, NITTIN NIVAS,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
... Respondent
2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,
3. THE THASILDAR(RR),
4. THE TALUK SURVEYER,
5. ABDUL RASSAK, S/O SYED MUHAMMED,
For Petitioner :SRI.GEORGEKUTTY MATHEW
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN
Dated :20/07/2007
O R D E R
S. SIRI JAGAN, J.
--------------------------
W.P.(C)NO. 22342 OF 2001
-------------------------
DATED THIS THE 20th DAY OF JULY, 2007
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is the auction purchaser of a piece of land
comprised in Survey No.63/27 of Santhanpara Village. The petitioner
submits that the 5th respondent is the owner of the adjacent land
which the petitioner purchased. According to him, respondents 3 and
4 in collusion with the 5th respondent managed to demarcate the
properties in such a way that the petitioner is deprived of the actual
land purchased by him and the fertile land was alloted to the 5th
respondent. With this complaint, the petitioner has filed Ext.P5
representation before the 1st respondent. The petitioner now seeks a
direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders
on Ext.P5. In the facts and circumstances of the case I direct the 1st
respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P5, after
affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner as well as the
5th respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two
months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE
Acd