Karnataka High Court
M/S Ambience Projects vs M/S Gurushree Properties on 30 March, 2009
IN nu; Hiiiiri coam; or A°1'Ai(A AT nzwQ_--r;i;{):é:e;%;~~ I 2 _
mcrm Tmfi THE 30*" DA':r" 01$ MARC}? 20¢-sf ' * V
i:3i:ii*'URh;V " V A
my HON'BLE MR,JUSTICl_.{Z A33»: ;VAZEE§§
CIVIL MISCELlANE_'0US PETI'1?'IG,NfN(§§95;&2§6Zvv7
Between: V A H a
EvifsA:nbienceProjec1:s--, if V
No.9}, 1" Floor, 6Q.fi;'R§§ad, 3:
K0ramangaia.6"' BE.s)ck;if; _ ~ 3
Bangaiere »~ 95,5' '
Reptnd:en1 entered
appearance through its leatnavnl-.ng§r1§o:éateg_ me respondent
has not flied any oiajecfions. 'V
4. I have {fir iha parties.
5. C-01'1Ii.'4€".':l"jf(:)':£' denies the aliegatiens
made ag{2eins1_the.Vpe£jfi§nrner 'in the Civil Misceilaszeous Petition.
f1Q_ objection for appointment at' an Arbitrator in
tanfiz. IX of Annexure 'A', the join: develeptncnt
.:gre£.+1nén'£. Ir;'ti2eA§§'i1A'¢u:nstances, i pass the fbllowing:
ORDER
” 1. sins petitian is allowed.
II. Sn? Kukkaje Ramakrishna Bhat, Retired District and
” “Séssions mdge, No. F-113, -4″‘ Fleet, Central Chambers, 2″” Main,