M/S Vishak International Ltd (In … vs Nil on 7 August, 2008

IN THE HIGH COURT 012' KARNATAKA,   

DATED THIS THE 7m DA¥.»C>.F\AI'jéI_%¥S'.i5 2 0"j&3:'k 
BEFo1é;*~3  1 % A  A

THE HONBLE MR. .:U;~;:*r§jIa::E RAM MQ}iAN éE£$DY %%

COMPANY APPLIcAT19i$r"}%NG-;}. 1545 'ofi_;oo7
COMPANY 'pmprifigou 339%. iaozazooe

BETWEEN

M/S. VAI.E3HJ-'.1

HIGH C0U'r~?9'9F EARNATAKA,'

4% FLOOR, 'o"&."'<§f"w1N--G;"'--«
KENDR'£YA«.SADAl'%', ._  " 
xoRAMAr4GALA,"' T . 
BANGALORE 4560'-O34 
 "   -._  APPMCAN'?

.  "(3yf'%%$Rf;'%L:;z§E:?AK, ADV)

--NiL+
 RESPONDENT

bFFfC£AL LIQUIEATOR FOR THE HALF’ YEAR ENDING

.?’39.o9.20o? AND FIX ms REMUNERATION AM) arc. ) Kk

THIS APPLICATION comma on __F§R’

THIS my THE COURT MADE Tm: FO_i}LC)WING: V

-an-__….–.r

oEBER

Auditor’s report accept駧i’.._ A1;dit0f3S~f€tf:~ fixed in

t€Z’1″l}.S of the order ;passed on OLE
No.211/07. kk

“or the Companies Act

R&q€;:i1’e:;i1.snt”” of .
is disj 3ens£idf.:s§:itI1v;, %

is

Sd/-.

Judgé

Qmgs,