IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CWJC No.3385 of 2010
Anita Kumari
Versus
The Union Of India & Ors
-----------
2. 28.6.2011. Mr. Manohar Prasad Singh for the
petitioner and Mr. Abhimanyu, learned Junior
Counsel to Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, for the
respondent Corporation are present.
Learned counsel for the Corporaiton
prays for a short adjournment to respond to
the issues raised in the writ petition.
It is the contention of the learned
counsel for the petitioner that although
admittedly the petitioner happens to be the
ward of the landoustee and had also
participated in the selection process of
appointment against the post of electrician
as also fulfills the qualifications for
appointment against the said post but the
respondent corporation has denied her
appointment on a single ground that she
happens to be a married person and as per the
relevant policy decision, it was
impermissible. The said policy decision is
not available on the records of the
proceedings.
2
By way of last indulgence, let this
matter be posted for consideration on
18.7.2011 retaining its position with a clear
stipulation that if no counter affidavit is
filed on behalf of the Corporation by the
next date, this court would proceed with the
hearing of the matter on the basis of
uncontroverted pleadings made in the writ
petition.
ahk
(Jyoti Saran, J.)