WP NO.4(}3'?df20{)2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGAL(:.}'RE
DATED was THE 30TH my OF JULY 2993 "
BEFORE
THE mmsns me. JUSTICE T_
WRJT PETITION m_.403'*;4{/'zoog (L§§\ " V
B ETWEEN:
Sri Kotc Anjancyaswamy T,-£m§)le
Trust, Pavagada, _
Repmscntcd by its Pmaident,
Sri P R Hanu1::1a:ntha.wRao, . V
The Successor in .i11!"€:_I'E:'i'§t oi?
Kate Srcc Anja11z:yas1r.:(_amy ' ._
Devastana(léx*:}ec;t§7:od1*¥:=;,*ta Sgva
Brahmauara Bccdifl.» . _'
Behind .':'I*e1V11p1é;T.__
Pavagada, " V' " % '
Tumkur Distrikzlg. M _ '
. (By S11 Ran;t9.xh','~--A;i_§r__._,¢.for pgtitioncxj
1. L*thé' smie
V V ' ~ . by its :9 Government
and Cofi2m§:§si<:'n§,t:1* Revenue,
-- - .. «De}:)a1*t:n1ei;t of Revenue,
_ ' .sa¢h:va1aya--:'tI,
' Buiidilig,
B R Ambedkar Veedhi,
.._B:;ng;3lorc-560 001.
V Tht: Bcputy Commissioner,
Tumkur District,
.. Ttlmkur.
V. J_
Petitioner
WP I\EO.4G3?4f2002
3. The Land 'I'ribu:1al,
Pavagada Taluk,
Pavagada,
Represented by its Secretaxy.
4. The Tahasikiar,
Pavagada Taluk,
Pavagada.
5. Sri V Ramesh,
Age: 45 years,
Sfo Late Vasudevaehar,
Residing at Near Maszid Read, it
Pavagada-561 202, 1
'Fumku1*I)istIiet. V _ " " Respondents
(By st: R B satsya:Q1a£';:a~;}au.sjng;:;""1-1§:;--" rm---1:é-1 to 4)
(By Sri Somashekatappa.;--uAdv_5,,___fisr VE'-533' '
~_ -- 1-
Tilis Writ: Petsitiml "is 'under Articles 226 83 22'? of the
C-0.nst'£t.u1iun of 'i«mi':£z-1,' pra;;i11g*'to quash vride Annexure-J dated
21.6.1999; issued by the'R-:2" and consequently ail proceedings before
R-{2A_ in VLi9?F_(1'vf)x ENAE"«4.f2{98-99 purported to be the proceedings
relating to g1*c¥i11tii:g_ of occupancy rights sought for by R-5 in Iespect
efi_the_ 'petit--ic_ir1er«veV£"emp1e lands under the Mysore (Religious and
ChaA1*ita&)1e)T'Iz1t-131$ 8."s_o.iitio11 Act, 1955, etc.
'I"}1is Petiiésii' eoming (311 for preii1m'11.a1y hearing this day, the
Court mafia. the fofiowing:
....*I;he petitioner; Sri Kate Anjafleyaswaany Temple, Pavagada,
TLL"--«: i*epiesented by its Pmsidcnt, is before this Ceuxt under Articles 226
ORDER
L
9:’? NC}.403?aii2EJG2
8:. 22′? of the Constitution of India, praying for various reliefs, as
mcntzioncti in the Writ Petition.
2. Counsci for the petitioner submits that
other reliefs except the relief mcntiGn_e1:i~ in fir) c$f.
Petiticsn. As per Ciausc (C) of the pr:§tycrT §if ‘the J
petitioner smzks a writ of manL3Vaifl31s ts fhc No.3 to
dispose of the application by Annexure-D
sacking occupancy fight £1i’–. V§:’c$péct2;_””i’:,:mp1c lands in case
NGLRF (M) ENA:42/ 9.8-99 ”
3. Coimsslihwfbr’ ‘1)e”tiVt»1″€:«x’1t::fi”Ai’i:u”‘..ii§cr submits that though W P
No.11187f ztspondent was disposed of on
13.8.1990, Vt};-§:” cider of the Tahsildar shall be effective
Vgiiifi the of I’ Aflitvjggattcr hcfam the Triblmal, the respondent
ANa:s_V..’5: Vna:1_;’5ret,A:;§Ii.<sposed of the application of the 53* respondent at
..fi§:i*i}1cr submits; that a direction may be gvcn to
Rfipondémt i*¥'Q.2,".Vnow who is C-OII1p1;':f£I1t authority, to pass vardcrs on
fi}r:<:i by Itspandcnt No.5 at Annexuzrc:-D.
'~'+. Learned Govcmmcnt Plcader submits that the application
. F33' 111% S33 respondent at Am1cxure~D is stiil pending for want of
records. He also subnfiiis that the I'C(.'OI'{1S of the Land Tzibunal have
Lg,
4
W? 310.483 ?&$/2962
been ztccivcd in the Ofiice of the Advocate Gtmcxal and the records
would be sent back to the: mspondent No.2] Bcputy Comiufissioncr
withm a short time and the W133; Petitioxa may be disposgdj 2.
5. Then: is 110 mpresentation for respondent ‘
6. In viaw of the submission of
peiitiencr and U36 lcalncd Govcn;31;cntSt: of £hé”=.§§?’rit Phtzfitidn
direction to the rcspondexlt VNo…V_2.
7. In the result, the WV;-;t’T-s?,e:§1_~i§§§ gr directing the
1*cspo11t3.c11ti’,§k).–f2′ t;;> °o*n ‘flit appiication filed by respondent
No.5 at Annéxugt–D, upportunity of htzaxting all the
ncccssagyj jiaxfics acfioxdance with law, within a period of four
Ii3,03v1:A1:1’z3_Vf1\)1;£i;ia’3ii:t of xtccipt of the copy of this elder. No costs.
.{3;ii§*{$inmcnt Picadcr is yanfsci three weeks time to file
_ ‘– _3;:41§:1I;:1o of a.ppe;_-araricc. –
Sd/-E
Iudgé
Bjs