Nagamma vs United India Insurance Co Ltd on 6 March, 2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALCBEQE  

Dated: This the 6th day of March Qt-"E69 V   A

BEFORE  

THE HON'BLI?. MR.JUS'I'ICE ;%x.a}_\@};gN':s;ATHAN-- ..  'V j T

 

M.F'.A.NO. 10654./20o6%%(M.\_/1    

BETWEEN:
1 NAGAMMA V  ..

W/O LATE RAMAUJ-I_P "  .
AGED ABOUT 42 AYR_S._ V

2 KRISHhéRPEj_£§    
S/O L.»r:.'1'-'=»;"~;_ RAMAIAH "  3   A
AGEI3-_AB"D§JT 24  Q_  

3 f*U*I"TAi1§}§x}U'A::3:'§V  _  1
S3/O._L--ATE RA1V§A_IA{rI .. % %
AGED.ABO_L'fT:_2.2 m':~3, 

4 _SHIVA':?A;.}U_' _ ._
4;: Si!) LATEARAMAIAH
._' '*A{iE1i)._ABOU'I'*2';$ YRS

 V' " » .Ai.»;.L   'RAMAIAHNAPALYA
 HORD1GERE,TUMKUR
   ...APPELLANTS

  (By ?.~;;ni SHMJAD V SHASTR1 83
   K GHHAT, Anvs>

   :5 Urmaa INDIA WSURANCEE co LTD

R N0 25, SHANKAR NARAYAN BLDG
M G ROAD, BANGALORE 1
BY ITS MANAGER



occupation of the deeeaeed as he was doing business

in seiling and purchasing of sheep in 

therefore the income should have been  _

Rs.3,500/-per month. He else  for 

enhancement of compensatjon:'».:u11{ierje' the 

Ices to the estate and love .g;1fi'ectioIs_  A A

3. 011 the other  'comm-1 for
the respondent no.   contended

that the mama; is just and

proper é ‘

: to the above submission

made, I the triiaunal couid have

the iIV1″(:GIge__.Of deceased, who was doing

__Rs.3,500/– per month and not at

1es.c2;5oo;c;% month and therefore taking the

i11co:;,ae’gjad.:V 4’Rs.3,5OO/– per month and applying the

* egpropfiate multiplier under the head of loss of

.’ tigependency, .3. 513.111 of Rs.1,03,961/- will have to be

awarded and towards iose to the eetate and love and

affection put together, Rs.’30.0()O/– would be

e

reasonable. Thus, compensation gets ”

Rs. _’1,33,961/– which will carry interast 1 b

Award stands modified

the appeal in part thus. ‘ .4 A. . ‘ ‘ 2
_
% Iudge

Dvr: