IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 19370 of 2009(M)
1. M/S.P.T.ANTONY AND SONS,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (AA),
... Respondent
2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER(APPEALS),
3. THE INSPECTING ASST. COMMISSIONER,
For Petitioner :SRI.V.P.SUKUMAR
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
Dated :10/07/2009
O R D E R
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.
........................................................................
W.P.(C) No. 19370 OF 2009
.........................................................................
Dated this the 10th July, 2009
J U D G M E N T
Challenging Ext. P1 assessment order passed by the
respondent in respect of the assessment year 2006-07, the
petitioner has already approached the appellate authority by
filing Ext. P2 appeal along with Ext.P3 petition for stay. The case
of the petitioner is that it is without any regard to the pendency
of the above proceedings before the second respondent that the
third respondent has chosen to proceed with recovery
proceedings under the Revenue Recovery Act as borne by Ext.
P4, which in turn has been subjected to challenge in the present
Writ Petition.
2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well.
3. Considering the facts and circumstances, the second
respondent is directed to consider and pass appropriate orders
on Ext. P2 memorandum of appeal as well as Ext.P3 petition for
W.P.(C) No. 19370 OF 2009
2
stay, as expeditiously as possible, in accordance with law.
However, it is made clear that till such appropriate orders are
passed on Ext. P3 petition for stay, all further coercive steps
pursuant to Ext. P4 shall be kept in abeyance.
The Writ Petition is disposed of as above.
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON,
JUDGE.
lk