Central Information Commission Judgements

Mr. Raj Kumar Upadhyay vs Banaras Hindu University on 19 February, 2009

Central Information Commission
Mr. Raj Kumar Upadhyay vs Banaras Hindu University on 19 February, 2009
                  CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
                         Room No. 415, 4th Floor,
                       Block IV, Old JNU Campus,
                           New Delhi - 110067.
                          Tel: + 91 11 26161796

                                             Decision No. CIC /WB/C/2007/00619/SG/1795
                                                Complaint No. CIC/WB/C/2007/00619/SG

Complainant                         :       Mr. Raj Kumar Upadhyay
                                            C/O Sri Prem Kumar Ji, N-4/4B, Karaundi
                                            Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh

Respondent                              :   Public Information Officer,
                                            Banaras Hindu University, Hindi Dept.
                                            Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh

Facts

arising from the Complaint:

Mr. Raj Kumar Upadhyay had filed a RTI application with the PIO at Banaras Hindu
University, Varanasi on 03/05/2008 asking for certain information. Since no reply was
received within the mandated time of 30 days, he had filed a complaint under Section 18 to
the Commission. The Commission issued a notice to the PIO on 19/12/2008 asking him to
supply the information and sought an explanation for not furnishing the information within
the mandated time.

The Commission has neither received a copy of the information sent to the
complainant, nor has it received any explanation from the PIO for not supplying the
information to the complainant. Therefore, the only presumption that can be derived is that
the PIO has deliberately and without any reasonable cause refused to give information as per
the provisions of the RTI Act. His failure to respond to the Commission’s notice shows that
he has no reasons for the refusal of information.

Decision:

The Complaint is allowed.

The PIO will send the complete information to the complainant before March 12,
2009. The PIO’s action clearly amounts to denial of information without any reasons. The
PIO is therefore, asked to submit a written explanation showing cause as to why penalty
should not be imposed and disciplinary action be recommended against him under Section 20
(1) & (2) of the RTI Act before March 17, 2009.

If the information has already been supplied to the complainant, furnish a copy of the same to
the Commission with your written submission.

Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties.

Shailesh Gandhi
Information Commissioner
February 19, 2009.