High Court Kerala High Court

Dr.K.P.Raman vs State Of Kerala on 23 November, 2007

Kerala High Court
Dr.K.P.Raman vs State Of Kerala on 23 November, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 34546 of 2007(K)


1. DR.K.P.RAMAN, RETIRED DISTRICT
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

2. ADDITIONAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT

3. DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES,

4. DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER(HEALTH),

5. SUPERINTENDENT,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.J.MICHAEL

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.GIRI

 Dated :23/11/2007

 O R D E R
                             V.GIRI,J.
                       -------------------------
                  W.P ( C) No. 34546 of 2007
                      --------------------------
            Dated this the 23rd November, 2007

                        J U D G M E N T

The petitioner who retired from service from the

Department of Health Services on 30.11.2001 is aggrieved by

Exhibit-P6 order issued by the Government, wherein it accorded

sanction to the Director of Health Services to proceed against

the petitioner for recovery of Rs.89,182/- stated to be the

pecuniary loss sustained by the Government under the

provisions of the Public Accountants Act, 1963.

2. According to the petitioner, the order is passed

without notice to him. Though he had sought for a personal

hearing, the same was not granted.

3. In my view, the petitioner has a right to object to any

demand that is made under the Public Accountants Act, 1963,

when the demand is made as such. Exhibit-P6 only accords

sanction to the competent authority to raise a demand under the

Public Accountants Act.

Learned Government Pleader brings to my notice Sub

section 3 (3) of the said Act which provides that if the Public

Accountant does not satisfy the demand, but appears and objects

W.P ( C) No. 34546 of 2007
2

to the claim wholly or in part, the Collector shall enquire into the

matter and record a decision. Obviously, if the petitioner objects

to the demand, the procedure under Sub Section 3 (3) will have

to be followed.

In the result, it is made clear that enforcement of the

demand, if any raised pursuant to Exhibit-P6 can only be after

following the procedure which is mentioned under Sub section

3 (3) of the said Act. Subject to the above observation, this writ

petition is disposed of.

(V.GIRI, JUDGE)
ma

W.P ( C) No. 34546 of 2007
2

K.THANKAPPAN,J

CRL.A. NO.92 OF 1999

ORDER

25th May, 2007