IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminial Misc. No.M-28482 of 2009
Date of decision : 12.10.2009
Pooja Pandey .....Petitioner
Versus
Union Territory, Chandigarh and another ...Respondents
****
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND
Present: Mr. Vikram Bali, Advocate for the petitioner.
S. D. ANAND, J.
Learned counsel states that he would be content and interests
of justice would be served if respondent no.2 is directed to dispose of the
representation Annexure P-5 within reasonable period.
The petition shall stand disposed of accordingly with a
direction to respondent no.2 to to dispose of the representation Annexure
P-5 made by the petitioners. The exercise shall be concluded within one
month from today.
The respondent No. 2 shall ensure that the petitioners shall
have the similar constitutional protection which is available to all the
citizens of the country under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The
reiteration of that obvious constitutional guarantee would not be inferred to
be an expression of opinion on the merits of the averments in the course of
the petition qua the factum/validity of their matrimonial alliance.
Disposed of accordingly.
October 12, 2009 (S. D. ANAND) Pka JUDGE