High Court Kerala High Court

Sebastian Mathew vs State Of Kerala on 7 April, 2010

Kerala High Court
Sebastian Mathew vs State Of Kerala on 7 April, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 14772 of 2007(H)


1. SEBASTIAN MATHEW,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. SHIJI JOHN,

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA,REP.BY ITS SECRETARY,
                       ...       Respondent

2. SECRETARY,LOCAL SELF ADMINISTRATION

3. DISTRICT COLLECTOR,

4. THE TAHSILDAR,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.JOMY GEORGE

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN

 Dated :07/04/2010

 O R D E R
            THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.
                   -------------------------------------------
                     W.P(C).No.14772 OF 2007
                   -------------------------------------------
                Dated this the 7th day of April, 2010


                               JUDGMENT

The petitioners, owners of petroleum outlets, have two fold

contentions against the assessment order under the Kerala

Building Tax Act, 1975. The first is that the impugned order has

been issued without giving sufficient opportunity of hearing. It

is stated that the said order was issued even before the period of

one month granted to file reply. The second ground is that the

canopy of a petroleum outlet does not fall within the definition of

the term ‘building’ for the purpose of the KBT Act. The latter

among the issues stands covered against the petitioners by the

judgment of this Court in All Kerala Federation of Petroleum

Traders v. State of Kerala [2004(1) KLT 1017]. Therefore, all

that survives is the plea for hearing. Learned counsel for the

petitioners states that his clients have serious objections to the

manner in which the total floor area has been calculated for the

WPC.14772/07.

2

purpose of determining the tax. He also states that the area

which is liable to be exempted has also been included in the floor

area. Under such circumstances, this writ petition is ordered

directing that following the production of a copy of this

judgment, the petitioners will be heard in relation to the

impugned assessment and for such purpose, the impugned order

is vacated hereby. The writ petition is ordered accordingly.

Sd/-

THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN,
Judge.

kkb.12/04.