T.S.Ramachandran vs Raju on 9 June, 2009

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Con.Case(C).No. 553 of 2009(S)


1. T.S.RAMACHANDRAN,TEJUS HOUSE,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. RAJU,REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.RINNY STEPHEN CHAMAPARAMPIL

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :09/06/2009

 O R D E R
                    ANTONY DOMINIC,J.
                 ---------------------
                    COC.No.553 OF 2009
               ------------------------
             Dated this the 9th day of June, 2009.

                         JUDGMENT

It is alleging that Annexure-A5 order passed by the

respondent is in violation of the directions of this court in

Annexure-A1 and A4 judgments, that the contempt

petition is filed.

2. Although the Government Pleader on instructions

sought to justify the order, Annexure-A5 order cannot be

said to be in compliance with the directions of this court.

This is all the more so far the reason that even Annexure-

A6 relied on in Ext.A5 does not justify the view that is

taken in Annexure-A5.

3. At this stage, the Government Pleader offers to

pass a reasoned order in compliance with Annexure A1 and

A4 to avoid further proceedings. I record the submission. It

is also undertaken that such orders will be passed within

one week.

COC.No.553/09 2

In view of the above submission I close the contempt

petition with liberty to the petitioner to approach this court if

the circumstances warrant.

                                (ANTONY DOMINIC)
 vi                                           JUDGE

COC.No.553/09    3