High Court Kerala High Court

V.K.Chami vs Palakkad Co-Operative Building … on 25 November, 2008

Kerala High Court
V.K.Chami vs Palakkad Co-Operative Building … on 25 November, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 34834 of 2008(V)


1. V.K.CHAMI S/O.KOOTAYI,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. PALAKKAD CO-OPERATIVE BUILDING SOCIETY
                       ...       Respondent

2. ARBITRATOR CUM SPECIAL SALE OFFICER,

3. SPECIAL SALE OFFICER, PALAKKAD DISTRICT

                For Petitioner  :SRI.RAJESH SIVARAMANKUTTY

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN

 Dated :25/11/2008

 O R D E R
            THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.
                   -------------------------------------------
                     W.P(C).No.34834 OF 2008
                  -------------------------------------------
            Dated this the 25th day of November, 2008


                              JUDGMENT

Having regard to the nature of the order being issued

hereunder, notice to the respondents 1 and 2 dispensed with,

preserving their right to move for review of this judgment, if

aggrieved. Learned Government Pleader appears for R3.

2. The petitioner faces execution of an arbitration award and

distress action which has led to sale of an item of property being

listed to be held tomorrow. This afternoon, this writ petition is

moved on the plea that arbitration proceedings were concluded

without proper notice and without affording sufficient

opportunity of being heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner

stated that the petitioner met with an accident and that he has a

fairly large family to support. The only statement about the

accident is in para 2 of the writ petition. Barring an averment

that difficulties arose by an accident that the petitioner met,

there is no materials even to understand as to when the accident

had occurred and what is the nature of suffering that the

WPC.34834/08

Page numbers

petitioner has been undergoing. As far as the large family that is

projected, one does not find any pleading in the writ petition.

Learned counsel for the petitioner then wanted me to see that

from Ext.P2, a representation produced as evidence. With all

this, there is really no materials to hold in favour of the

petitioner on any of the grounds raised. The petitioner had also

alternate remedies to challenge the arbitration award and also to

seek remedies even if those proceedings were ex parte. The

request of the petitioner gets confined in this 11th hour to be one

only for further time to make the payments.

In the aforesaid circumstances, repelling all other

contentions, it is directed that if the petitioner makes deposit of

an amount of Rs.5,000/- at or before the time fixed for sale

tomorrow and continues to remit the entire remaining

outstandings by making payments at the rate of Rs.15,000/- per

month, payable on or before the last working day of every month

commencing from December, 2008, the impugned distress action

will stand deferred and dropped ultimately. However, if there is

WPC.34834/08

Page numbers

default in remitting any of the instalments as aforesaid, the

benefit of this judgment shall stand recalled automatically and

distress action shall follow. The writ petition is ordered

accordingly.

Sd/-

THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN,
Judge.

kkb.