Sadhana Educational Trust (R) vs The State Of Karnataka on 10 February, 2009

 =  _1. The.;3fat€Vcf-"E£af1fi'ataka,

  % j ? secondary).

 Bangs:-.?.é>re~560 001.

to  

 '  "Bangalore Rural District,

IN THE HIGH coum 012* KARNATAKA AT BANGALoR:;§«%%»T%LV%V_
DATED THIS THE mm DAY OF FEBRUARY zoéjg  J   
BEFORE _w-_ x V

THE HOWBLE MR. JUSTICE Am' ;§_§_AGiv}NJA:,    '

WRIT PETITION NO. 1972?,*2Qo8(Edn»Rag/P) 

BETWEEN :

Sadhana Educational 'I'rust(R)1, V  ' "
By its Secretary,  V   -- 
S1'i.K.G~.Sri:nivasa Mtuftjly,  g 
S/o.Late .Govindap_Da;j[ V  % *

Aged about 34   ' .  . V
Occ: Runr1in§;__Litt1¢:i"Iv'i;.3ste:f_"' _ " " 
Public Schdel, Kaaf;tana"i(ut}te;' _
Mallathahafly Peat,"    ' -
Qoddabaliapitr Taiuk, "  ~_  " 

Bangalore RuI'a1__ 1)i$ti'i::t.*.. " _  ...PETZ"I'IONER

 _ (I3jsr« Hiremath, Adv.)
Z&£\}Df:* ~
By it$«4._P1'in'cip$1I Secretary,
'Educat;ioI'1A ..Department
M».S.'Buj}.di11g,
 'The: Deputy Director of
Public Instruction,

Eangalore.



Roficy  "the   of the said memo is at

i,pejf.ii:ioner .'--..School to run a Kannada Medium School
  éfroiifi-.,VE'>ta'f:da1tis I to V. But however, the petitioners
 teachmg the students in English medium. Hence,

 "show cause notice was issued and response was 

3. The Block Education Officer,
Doddabaflapur Taluk, .    .4
Bangalore Rural District. .. .RESPONDE§*FTS,V'_~ .    _

(By Sri.B.Manohar, ASA)

This writ petition is filed undeii Ar_t:icles"22t3,  V'
22'? of the Constitution of India' with a.A.p:*ayere.to 'oquashi
the impugned memo dated 08. 1.,1J'2{)O6 wide
'A', issued by the R2.»  .  .. ' 

This writ petition     preiirnzhary
hearing, this day, the Court made-the 

The   withdrawa} of the
recog:x1itio1:i;Aof  to a memo dated

08.11.2006 «or; of violation of Language

 recoglition was accorded to the



 .of'~t1ie ease. Consequently, I do not fnd

   

it it   Bet_Ahos2ever, it is open for the petitioner to make a
'.ai§;5iice.tion to start an English Medium" Sehooi or

  '  a" Medium School.

-3-

calied for. The said response did not find favoist'
the respondents inasmuch as the factual  off 1 "

matter was that indeed the petitioner?
teaching/inlpaftiillg eciiication in
Hence, I am of the View that «.

cannot be faulted.

3. It is aiso the said
endorsement Writ petition
is filed in H students are not
aecommodsted «A ‘ reeognised schools, they

shali be done: – memorandum of de-

reeogr1isi;’1§geA.the cannot be faulted in the

rejected

Reserving liberty to do so, petition stands disposed

of.

i

4. Mr.B.MaI10har, learned Additional G0verz1n1fs.fh1:i’*._V

Advocate appearing for the respondents is

file memo of appearance within four weeks.

SP8