MFA. No. 1664 0172009 fC?C§
AND MISC. CIVIL 4253 OF 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT op' KARNATAKA AT BANQALQRE
DATED THIS THE 1971* DAY OF JL1NE;2ir)09vV'_',:---ii _ 7
BEFORE %
THE HONBLE we JUS'Pi€;I§f H:.C;_. RAMESS V "
MEA, No. 1564 0i32(,$:)9'T(c:i:«t;)' ''
$35.3}. "
OF %
;
1 SMTN PPUSHPA %
W/O. LATE KUMAR. V » v
AGED ABQUT 3L-¢&*9;EARg%%%%% V «V
R10. N£}."2396.=:KA;LEGOWv {;A_..EG}AD
WHALL5 %
_ %
MYSQRE VI13'I!'§'.!f !§tI..(__3"f..4'
. K1 APPELLANT
(B1jSRL P ADVOCATE)
X er:%au::m 3/0. LATE smmzwa
AGE}? 38 YEARS
R/A-. ac». 2410, KALEGOWDA map
..N:'},NJANGUD TOWN - 57:30;
MYSQRE 1:>1s*m1c:'r
% , RESPONDENT
(RESZPQNDENT SERVED)
msc. cmz. 4253/2mg IS FEED UNDER exam
M41 RULE 5 R/W. 151 OF’ CEPJZB. PRAYING TO STAYTHE
OPERATION AND FURTHER PROCEEDINGS OF THE
MFA. No. 1654 0? 2909 ECPC)
AND MISC. CIVIL 4253 0? 2009
2 %
IMPUGNED 012933 PASSED BY THE LEARNFfi;3.:”€.§IRIIL
JUDGE (sxum), NamANF,:e_ 4.3%m%E%4%; (r)
05* cm, AGAINST THE 01213212 {DATED *13.12«..2oN.), .NANJAN’GUD, Amownze 1A-
No.1 may UNDER oRDER;39RULEs 1′ 2 FOR
’12; _ ~
THIS MFA comm}cm?0§%%%l3k1jM1ss1oN ALONG
WITH MISC. CIVIL 4;2%5:3k 0F; DAY, THE
COURT DELIVEREB mm kx-jogmwxngsy; »
.,a_pp§3}1ant in thc appeal in RA.
No.72 r.§’fai2 (3£)’7′ is an intcrltncutoxy order
da§:c_% d’ 318*” passed by the lower appellate
CQ1;Il’$ LA, No.1 filed by the respondent by
appellant from putting-up any petty
k % .k snap :12: gm’ dispesal ef the afuresajd appeal,
I have heard the learned counxi appearing
” lféf flie appellant and perused the impugmd order, The
3&5/’
!\§F’A. N0. 1664 OF 2009 {CFC}
AND MISC. CIVIL4253 OF’ 2009
3
respondent thaugh served with the notice of
has remained absent. _
. 4?.
3, A perusal of the ” up/_
ag
}?a1″ag’aph-9, the lower appelléiitf
that the appellant had 1L).i.3t–p;”pV..V k¥..-mgpk 193/
relying on the 1*epori~..9f — Cguncil,
Nanjangud. In my _§:’}:§};i%5§§T, appel1atC Court
having obsesjrrvcfz;-.r£iV Vfi:11a’i:;A__ thfi already put-up
the V passkag the impugned
9rder”-filpugled girder is liable to be
set aside, IA’i3:1Va 1§=.2 the fofl-swing order:
(ii)? A.t}1t_=: order is sat aside, LA’
” tiled in RA. N0.72/2007 stands
A j dismissed;
~~ V thfi lowttr appellate Court is directed to
dispose 31′ the appeal in RA.
No.72] 2007 cxpeditieusly and in any
event within three months from the
B<\'p/
MFA. No. 1664 OF 2009 {CFC}
AND MISC. CIVIL 4253 OF'2009
4
date of receipt] pmductien cf a u
this judgement g
In View of allmving tbs é_vppt:§-.:a_1«_. ‘
passed 011 Misc. cm: 4253-/_2Q£)§?A.§1ed $
and it stands disposed of ._ 1