Raj Kumar Singh vs Dy.D.And Others on 22 July, 2010

Court No. - 18

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 16901 of 1996

Petitioner :- Raj Kumar Singh
Respondent :- Dy.D.And Others
Petitioner Counsel :- R.Pandey
Respondent Counsel :- A.Sharma

Hon'ble Arun Tandon,J.

Nobody is present on behalf of the writ petitioner even in the revised reading
of the cause list.

The writ petition filed in the year 1996 is directed against suspension. It
appears that the writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time.

Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Interim order, if any, stands discharged.

Order Date :- 22.7.2010
Puspendra