Gujarat High Court High Court

Tuljashanker vs Gujarat on 21 July, 2010

Gujarat High Court
Tuljashanker vs Gujarat on 21 July, 2010
Author: Ks Jhaveri,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCA/8551/1994	 2/ 2	JUDGMENT 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 8551 of 1994
 

 
 
 
 
HONOURABLE
MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI
 
 
=========================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

1
		
		 
			 

Whether
			Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

2
		
		 
			 

To
			be referred to the Reporter or not ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

3
		
		 
			 

Whether
			their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

4
		
		 
			 

Whether
			this case involves a substantial question of law as to the
			interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order
			made thereunder ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

5
		
		 
			 

Whether
			it is to be circulated to the civil judge ?
		
	

 

 
=========================================
 

TULJASHANKER
JAMNADAS VYAS - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

GUJARAT
STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION & 1 - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================
 
Appearance : 
MR
MUKESH H RATHOD for
Petitioner(s) : 1, 
MRS VASAVDATTA BHATT for Respondent(s) : 1 -
2. 
=========================================
 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 21/07/2010 

 

 
 
ORAL
JUDGMENT

The
petitioner has prayed to direct the respondent corporation to pay
back wages to the petitioner from the date of dismissal to the date
of reinstatement on the basis of continuity of service and also to
fix the salary of the petitioner on the basis of various settlements.

By
efflux of time the petition has become infrucutous. The petition
stands disposed of accordingly. Rule is discharged with no order as
to costs.

[K.S.

JHAVERI,J.]

ar

   

Top