Gujarat High Court High Court

Maheshbhai vs Hariom on 28 February, 2011

Gujarat High Court
Maheshbhai vs Hariom on 28 February, 2011
Author: Ks Jhaveri,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

AO/35/2010	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

APPEAL
FROM ORDER No. 35 of 2010
 

=========================================================

 

MAHESHBHAI
ARVINDBHAI KOTHARI - Appellant(s)
 

Versus
 

HARIOM
DAHYABHAI UPADHYAY & 5 - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MR
AJ PATEL for
Appellant(s) : 1, 
None for Respondent(s) : 1, 
MR JAYESH A DAVE
for Respondent(s) : 1.2.1, 1.2.2,1.2.3 -
6. 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 28/02/2011 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER

1. By
way of filing this appeal from order the appellant has challenged the
judgment and order dated 29.12.2009 passed below Exh.5 by learned
14th
Additional Senior Civil Judge, Vadodara, in Special Civil Suit No.
330 of 2008, whereby the learned Judge has rejected the Exhibit-5
application.

2. Heard
the learned Counsel for the appellant. On 18th February
2010 this Court has granted status quo and directed both the parties
to maintain status quo. Considering the facts and circumstances of
the case I am of the opinion that interest of justice would be met by
passing the following order:

“The
parties shall maintain status-quo granted by this Court while
admitting this matter till the disposal of the suit. If an
application is filed by the other side before the trial Court to
expedite the suit, the trial Court shall expedite the suit. Both
side shall co-operate with expeditious hearing of the suit. It is
made clear that while deciding the matter the Trial Court will not be
influenced by the observations made by both the Courts at the time of
passing of interim order.”

3. With
the aforesaid directions and observations, the appeal from order is
disposed of.

(K.S.JHAVERI,J.)

pawan

   

Top