High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Tuntun Kumar Singh @ Tuntun Yadav vs State Of Bihar on 15 September, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Tuntun Kumar Singh @ Tuntun Yadav vs State Of Bihar on 15 September, 2010
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              Cr.Misc. No.24825 of 2010
             TUNTUN KUMAR SINGH @ TUNTUN YADAV SON OF BIRENDRA
                               YADAV
                                           Versus
                                    STATE OF BIHAR
                                         -----------

3. 15.9.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the

offence under Section 366/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that even though the allegation

in the first information report is that the daughter of the informant

was kidnapped by the accused persons and subsequently the

victim has also given incriminating statement, but it transpired

during investigation that in fact there was love affairs between the

victim and co-accused Sanjeev Yadav, on account of which a

Panchayati was held, in which the father of Sanjeev Yadav

produced some love letters written by the alleged victim, which

shows that there was a previous history of an affair between the girl

and the said Sanjeev Yadav and the present case is a concoction.

Considering the same, let the petitioner above named,

who is in custody since 28.4.2010, be released on bail on

furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties

of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court

concerned to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur,

Arrah in Arrah Muffasil (Dhobaha O.P.) P.S.case No.238 of 2009,

subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close

relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy
-2-

as to how he is related with the petitioner, (ii) that the affidavit shall

clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case

and if he is he shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailor

shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if

the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after

his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will

be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the

ground of misuse, (iv) that the petitioner will give an undertaking

that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be

present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two

given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable

to be cancelled for reasons of misuse and (v) that the petitioner will

be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two

consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

( Anjana Prakash, J. )

Narendra/