High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Rabindra Sharma @ Rabindra Mistry vs The State Of Bihar on 15 September, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Rabindra Sharma @ Rabindra Mistry vs The State Of Bihar on 15 September, 2011
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                       Criminal Miscellaneous No. 30299 of 2011
                         Rabindra Sharma @ Rabindra Mistry,
                        S/o Late Sukan Sharma @ Sukan Mistry.
                                        Versus
                                  The State Of Bihar
                                    -----------------

02. 15.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for

the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323,

324, 325, 307 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code and

Section 3(i) S.C./S.T. Act and Section 302 IPC was added.

The petitioner was refused bail by order dated

10.08.2010 but liberty was given to renew his prayer for

bail after framing of charge.

It has been submitted that the charges have

been framed on 31.05.2011.

Considering the same, let the petitioner, above

named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like

amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to

the satisfaction of 12th Additional Sessions Judge, Patna

in connection with Special Case No. 75 of 2010 arising out

of Bakhtiyarpur P.S. Case No. 43 of 2010 subject to the

following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a

close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit

giving genealogy as to how he is related with the
2

petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the

Court if there is any change in the address of the

petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the

petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is

he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall

also state on affidavit that he will inform the court

concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case

of similar nature after his release in the present case and

thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the

proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of

misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on

each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates,

his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

(Anjana Prakash, J.)
Vikash/-