High Court Karnataka High Court

Shri Irappa S/O Balappa Gudisalad vs The Asst Commissioner on 2 April, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Shri Irappa S/O Balappa Gudisalad vs The Asst Commissioner on 2 April, 2009
Author: Ajit J Gunjal
 _ A (BS6 «ézgiv. 'A, $1 PATEL, .A_Q'_£?;3

 ,A

IN' mg HEGH COURT ore' KARNATAKA   " «' L' 
CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAIB  ' 
DATED THIS THE'. 2m: I3A3Vj:;<i§}f«':}%§z<»gIi;, 2'o §:;9 : "
EESFORE   A.  '
THE HONBLE MR.JQ3iffc%:: AL.r.i':*g.:...:;L¥f§;:IAi;.y  

WRIT PE'I'iTiON NO.6226<%= éi;;:255.§2oo9A{LB»..EL:'*

BETWEEN:

1. SHRE. If?APPA,'«S/"'0 BALAPPA G«IJDI$AL£{),
AGE 43 YEl5,_RS;€}F}«':V Pfifisisgjljw. 01:' 
GRAM 1D5;Nc'£iAs'm':, KAL-LUE,   
TALUK YE}LBUR'_GA, '.D2sT*.~.';~:OPPAL.';

2. SMT. MAH;A;teI_)Bz,v:_ _  .

W /(:3 HASANSAB KAKK1 Hp.1.,:_,i:, -
AGE :23 Y.EAi?;S, s::a'<3.c '£»*:,Ea'~.-3¢Bi3R,
GRAM PANCHAYAE: '§:Ai;;,_UR,
TALUK YE.§,Ba,rRc;:3, L'.:1s*1.f: KOPPAL.
* -- V  ' ._,PE*i'm0NERs

.............

if ATHLE AS§iST;iNT COMMISSIQNER,
;«;::.>::>1=§_,_a-;I’, $253 mvxsxmz, 1313?: KOPPAL5

– ‘-2: ‘THE SECRETARY emu PANCHAYAT,

{:a*?’srQ:’? VIDYAVATI ii. ace? ma Raspezwgms}

” *K,!§,LLU1″-=3 TQ. Y’E§LBU’R?GA,DiS’f’ KOPPAL

.,.R”ESPONDEN’E’S

‘§’}~E§S WRIT PETETIQN ZS FELEEI IJNDER AR’1″iCLE1S 226 AND

V’ 22′? C313′ THE CONSFITBTION OF’ ENDIA PRAYENG TC} QUASH THE

EMPUGNEIB MEETENG NOTICE DATED 16/CV09 ISSUED BY THE
RESP(f3N;T}EN’E’ NCJR1 AS PER ANNElXUR’E~=§’s AND ETC.

“V ‘ §:ar§:’e€Ee:}:;e.~v%. _

«A _, {)3};

U already ruied

THIS WRET PETITEON, C V V _
HEARING, Ti-EES DAY, THE COURT, MADE THEFG-I4LOWE.N€3V: ”

Smt. K. Viéyavati, iéflflefi C}.:}_V€3’111I;€é:fiiif; Eleader is.–. ‘

directed tz) take notice fer thé i*e_$pQndéntS,:V’

2. Two grou1iclr§’ 1:116 lealned
counsei appeafirgg iii): gttie ‘443§o”5£it&.c;§f3;§§rs to avoid :10-
take place

corxfidence’ > to on

03/o4;20a9;’;:%% “is i;’i;§i,~it meg: :5 days notice and the
other fhat ;1€1ti§e,=V.:’.is not accompanied. by the

requisitien -~ £11-Eif1;€ ~ ‘£3y'” the members seeking :13»

be seen that the matice issued is

V V .V datééi 2909 and the scheduied meeting is on

0%;/QVQQQ. Hence, i am of the View that there is claar

— 1;’§§<':»i'ajiz's nofics {mm the date :33." issuance. Insafar as the

":'€7q22isitior; to accampany £116 1103786 is coficemed, it is

omnm ON mr2'~'._§Ra"«:L;z§é'1:i9$A;2¥{ V'

in am: Petitien N0.619'?'8~«"79/2009

/"'

disposed 01" on 17/03/2009 as

it is r1ot__

Having regard to these facts, impggned " .

faulted.

No merit. Rejected.

Smt. K.V’idyave;t1§§V;” leemed. Gcfireflument Pieader is

-I’? /’E

permitted to fiie memo of W6€i{S. ”

sd/-

JUDGE

kmv