High Court Karnataka High Court

Mrs Imelda Kalyani Prabhu vs A Gopal on 15 December, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Mrs Imelda Kalyani Prabhu vs A Gopal on 15 December, 2010
Author: Dr.K.Bhakthavatsala
-I:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 15"" DAY OF DECEMBER 2010

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE K. BHAKTHAvAT_s;'§ii;A~»'_'  4- 

REGULAR FIRSTAPPEAL No.14o1/2909{DEc~&T1Ng1f:  .1"  'V

BETWEEN:

Mrslmelda Kalyani Prabhu,
W/o.M.U.WiIIiam Prabhu,
Major,

R/a.No.9, Scott Lane,
Narain Piflaj Street Cross,
BangaIore--56O 001.

{BY S1'1'.B.M.Arun, Adv.)       

AND:

1. A.Go al,  ' . .
S/o./§)ssaba1dhar1'u1_~, ' - 
Aged abqut 733 years-,

2. "San1p.ang:.rafma,_ A'
S/p'.A.Gopa'1..A'  AV --.
Aged about  

 = V ' L-akshrmpathy, .   A

S,".0.A.Gopai} 

"  iV»'vz~'..ge'd about 353 years,

  Saif1_1s.h Kumar,

S['Q.A-.GOpaI,

.  -Aged about 33 years.



5. Kantharaj,
S/o.A.Gopal.
Aged about 31 years,

6. Sashikumar,
S/o.A.Gopa1,
Aged about 27 years,   

7. Sadashiva Kumar.
S/o.A.Gopa1.
Aged about 25 years,

8. Dhauushkumar.
S/o.A.Gopa1,
Aged about 23 years,

9. Nagamma.   A
D/o.A.Gopal, ,   
Aged about 45 years,  _. . " 
10.Re1i1ukamma.  . :.
D/o.A.Gopa1',""~ . _  5.;
Aged about 42 yea1'.sv,V  

11.Subbamma," by 4'
D/o.A.Gopal, A , . .
Aged abort 37 years.' * 

12V.Munira'1';hna-.''' :  "
Dy/o.A'.«G_opal,=_   __
Aged 'aboutv  year_s,_'_.

7,'1.3;.s1~:dex}i,.__y' V .
A T D./o.A.Gopa'},
 . ..  aboui V24 years.



Respondents 1 to 13 are

R/a.No.814/464,

5″‘ Main. 4″1 Block.

13* Stage, HER Layout’
Bangalore–43. …RESPONDENTSW

This R.F.A is filed under Section 96 of CPC..Vagain–st.tl1e”‘._
Judgment <3: Decree dt.19.12.2008 passed-in»{)iS.E$fo.l'6494/V2004",
on the file of the XXVHI Addl. City CiVi1bJu.d_gef. 'Ma'yohail.yIJnit,_ ;
Bangalore, dismissing the suit for declaration &. _"pern¢1an'ent7–V

injunction.

This appeal coming on for further’r»z)Ti*ders, the Conn
delivered the following:«

JUDGME_:Ni1:’l”

In spite~’of”grantin§f:.;’:’wo”Weeks”time to do the needful. the
appellant has :n_ot”dorie: ” h

2. Appeal Adi:-3’I”I1iS.S€dv for non–compliance of office

0hvjVeetions’;i” . V

t 3d/..

JUDGE

.: AA 7