Ramegowda S/O. Puttegowda vs Ramesh on 15 December, 2009

IE THE HIGH CQURT OF KAEHATRKA AT BANfifiL5KE

W§*W” Tfiifi THE 35TH D”? Q? DECEMBER 39??

Byron:

T33 HQ§’BLE ME; ausrzcz fi;G;RAMESfl x

REA I239 TQS Q17′ 20!)?
BETWEEN

….._–.u_….._.—u

namaaewna,
ale. PUTTEfi5n-R,

AGES AEGUT 56 ,;zans,
fifQ.§ mm.2141;’

II CEGSS; BASAVESHWRRA RG39,
K.E.MQfiALLA,

‘~;,; E?PELL&flT{3}

:3» 5z:yuths; 5,%@c§£s$a’§ sflmnzsy M;K
; “.C.Rfi1KK&fiJI, auvacazasg

;*EamM$&, v.. 3
Eafazfi saga E5? Kfifififi,

fyAGEQ AmQfiTV§7 ygaxsi
_ g;=§;:f§a.244,

~,’r:Vg&QsSA saaavmaawaaa READ,

.»x KA3;Hafi3LLA,

Ah 31-:

A323 “EGUI 52 2:333;
RfAT.D.HQ.2Zé3

II cnoss,3asAvE3HwAaA acau,
x.R.MuHALLA,

§;; &£s§§§n£§fi:$3″v’

E33 filed U35 195 sf C93, agéina; thé*Jndgmént
5 Decree dad: 23.2.2909 gaéaad in 3;; gs aaizcg?

an the fil

II:

|”‘f
:3’
IF
H
H
i
I23.

I21.

Inn!
1”)!
I x
4
I-*
E–I-I

. H

.V_»g _«

‘ F3

“EH;

:3

-é
an
I13′-I
H
‘IE

aliawing tfie agneél aha éafitififi aaide tha judgment

ésaed in G8. 332f2§Q9 an the

V

and fiecree dtfl;”3.1}2§§?V

file ¢£.:h§’y:1a”:.g;vi1 JLag_ {Jr;Qn¢}§-Myaere;

“_Thiéai£A ié,¢;ming an E9: Qréerai this dayf the

…….-..—m-..-

.’.p§ai1ant ta arrav nfnintiff E9=3 as resgéndant

, ‘E…-.–.–.

$y.Date: Efijfiflfi
C. Date:0;>g_\H\10

“*1; !§;e:-:zisst.ar:£- ‘ Regmtra

V vHigh’.’VC?:::;’rt Kaziziatakl
V M ».¥¥z£xz§;’a’i::xre~5£§{3 G01