EN ma HIGH CQUR'? er? §<ARNAT;;£=§%_" V
CIRCUIT BENCH AT GUIJBARQ . V
M739 Tiiis THE um mp-§g9VV{3V1V:§f's§;§';'E?;1$z£VI§%§VEV'2:'??
PRESE§T',V V' V'V V
THE H€3?§'BLE V
L ;AN$VV§ ' A V
THE: HON'i?-LéVM;?.J{;.E%"§?§Cf:§.V:fi3§§3i' I*_v'£ALiMf&"FH
V §;§'VIV§«'V¥§§V§§,"}.$%é§?'1V\i'2§€i§2VtLAc)
. A AfiND
1.
. ¢_:gJ;E’A«.q;f§<).E:__.;"%_:3.; 2004 Ms:
zamr;i§E:.V54V§2_1{é$:'?G2.V§.V.V___ % % V
W' «-
.’v E
V V ‘ …:xsz,; .13: jggagmggsas
{:3 ‘.
V
V ” “3iT’H§ $?’Ex::V:;§i, Lfigfiflg A€QU§S§’§’I€§§\E
.::}¥§§£CER, m~e*g,’~M:P GUE,E£EC’%fia.,
f;*:»z£i:E§<:':.::U':'§v*s ENGIKEER,
..5 APP§LLfi;F~€'E'S
={§§y'=$7R:.M.KuMA§, AGA}
BAS§i'§?&RAJ
Sfili SEBRz%MAF'?'A
E}E"'x.'EE"§fiRAPPA,
S ,1' G S§*§ARAE*ziE§P?fi
Kw.)
B“‘§’Ei 352:3 M;%.}{}R§ R/Q “‘~fE’.§~I§.E£’¢ITS
(E3? SEE Sé3.SAJJAN SHESETY, §s.D’J.,}
$3123 MFA 18 page arzszingzé-‘S’§:’;’;*::;r§:’ $x;g::;”e’::F i,;;:’; A_ 1A??’1’k4,9;;*:j’rzgs:”:;:;L>
ax: use §~z<1:=:»2<:;;§28 0?: ma Ema §«”V*j:’E»e’§:; E ADSL, {fi’x§Ei,’.=.4}I}E)¥i§§4′:.,«
gsm:sNj;, GTJLBARGA, PAR’fT:::5*–..;,LL<::'s,a?INC: ':T"§:iE~:v~.i._;:.1EE%E:–~:%E1~é<_:2"
?E3TiTT£{i%N 130;? gmaaycga :vz}.r3:a:;~zsm*;::rs;i —
Mm casss-a3JEc*r:i§o*H’_ 3 13 }é;)§i3§; . ‘ – .. A
BETWEEN:
E. 3AS&’J&Rfi;I_ V
3/0 $’§B%?f::¥
Sf?)
B{j;%”}7’Z%§ 3£§§§3i zs5A§;2::§;*~§2,*§:fi'””2$é:=ié<:;x'§'§2§;§~::ké£;§,
<'f:§§§_BAE%€;i:;».-55;; '£'ALU.'%3i 8J%",-€iL"E'<L3E¥S
" " _ A $;'3.,4sAsk:A:%éé§:§r§'?Y, Ami;
" .1 *§*§«':V'*:§'j_§.i3E;8:A1j .i:%N§ Afff;QUiS§"§'§QE\§
, ;i;'r*.§4§RSLE2Q{H?CR3A$&§$¥”
THE3fiDfiMEWFAN§aWfiRD§%TED1?42fi&2@%£EDENéfifi.*
N@5@y@80NTHEEmacmT%E:AmDL«mvuHnnm$msg3§;*’
GULBARC%h PARTLY ALLounN@ ?HE REFERENC§*PE?fi§ON'”,
$09 ENHANCED CoM?ENsgmsN AwB.sam§NG>§aR?HaRa
ENHgNcEM€N?<nr¢oMPENS§maN.g _A~
MFA ANS CROSS4MH¥fl€ON AQ§,c0§§fiG"©N"géR
HESERENG TE-HS §)§s,Y, I'%'.K.P£:;'!_'1§.«_V J. BEIEJEVVEEQEQVV YES
§'QLL@WING:–
.__.t._…_’..;……………………………
avnemfififfl
gaa 5491×2002 jsf§a§§#£;’égg$§g the Connnan
judgment pa$seé in
LAC éigf £11:-2 8I}1011I1t awardeci
by the is;_’vv”e5«;_n (311 {ha gre:3u:1§ 333$ tha
°23,’mé’2–_1:1g’» a§x2g3″d€é iiiafiequaia 311% mquixes fer
L.§::§:a::<r<:;}i:1¢::t§ " '_.
“$316 brisf facts of tha €8.86 are as feiloxsssz
he Eazzfi baaréng S3: Nofigj 12?; measurizlg 2 a<:ms ef
' {gig iand situatefi at Venkatbensfiur vifiaga, Gulbarga fiisiirict
bag 2966;: 11«:}tified and acquimd E3? the Stats Gaverzzment
thmugh tha Sgeaéai Land Acquisiiion; {)ff:s:':ei; Ev? & M.§.R5
%W
I
Gtiibarga, for construction cf Khaji Khatxaoar Wat.3f'-
The preimlilfzsary notificatisn was isstzaé under j5'–E:.{__1§-'~'.<§i' _
the Lazici Acquifiitien Act {far shor'£mfffi1e Aci;.'}"a:3i:§d W
was p1z¥:s}isht::d in the Céazatte daisgd 30$. 'f0flefi,z§;§
{he final nefificaiion iss11::<iV»Ti1a:;;;§:z~::' VS§:pfi0n
The Lmid Acqlgisifion {}ffit§ficatim’:–Ex.P1’7 issued by the Jurisd.iCt£0I1ai Cemgfitctnt
atzthority and further ease erf the appellants is ~
ciaeiuction towazds cost of cuitivation is {aka} at’§”:0°x€§”iifsteés.ci =
of 499/?) in msyect {Eff the dry land’ .7I7T’1_c_:41’vE:i:'{;;1″€:’, K V’
suhmittsd that $336 judgment arid ;:§a*3S:£é:.:i ‘
Reference Caurt is Bahia 1:0 ‘¥:3e’*-.mo{iifieci
masanabifi cemptinsafiun.
3. The stzbmiéaiszx Bf “Ic”:éIf1f{:~:1_ counséi far this
cmsswebjaciars Vatvtha 1011′: -S3? Reference (hurt
has a taking the yieleti of Tur at
4 quixztiéfi par acfié 6 Quinta} per acre as per thfi
yielci -*::ert§fi§;’£&?¢V- 1% iééueé bf; the Juzfisdictiozzal at1th0ri*.;y
tgixe £§g;jcuiVtiiVi*é§1 D€partme:}t§ Guiharga. He fuzfizer
t4 ¥f1a:%.,”_’_.tI3.€ Refemnee {fiourt committed an error in
gi’r_iiig at 53″/Ea {awards Cast 0f cuitivatian which
Caiifléstv 13.5: sugtamable. Qniy 40″/e can he takmz for the dry
‘Z”h€rsfor&, he submitiéé that, the award gasseé by
$15 Reffirancfi fietzrt has ‘E9 136 medifieé by awarding just and
masanable fiompsnsatia
4. Per coxztra, learned AGA for the appe}}:f1:ii§§_;’–«¥%ii€:tf:1′
alia, cantendad and substantiated the judgmegifi
passed by the Reference Court as.§u»s.4:_ ;;;1c?=’ é,VIVl?1′ d()’e=;§” ” .
not call fear intexfemnce by this ” hits:
fairly submitttid that the yislfi. i{:sWa1’ds L’
par acre which is not ‘x__Thg:j’ jfi$ t” gfiopez’ yield
is 6 quintai par ffy&i.je’14ii–VL’V§g%f£3ficate–Ex.P14 and
ftlrther submitfittrj that tcwaltls cost of
cz11t:ivati<31:::«*V __ V' fiééftnot be sustaixmable.
The " wbe 40'/o. Hence, he
d.isp£;e1e.::_ _ % '
AMINO
tin VV5. the lerarneci AGA appearing for
;_a:1Q}21:}1a:1A{'$ ] rsszpfindents ané. the learned counsel
a}§;3€5:::tjit;g"~ §'<)r the: claimantsfcrosswebjectors at a
'Q iengtt1 of time.
,.–
50. After car:-afai corzsideration of the su’i::miss’i0ns
‘ ‘mfide by {ha 3:’CSptE:C’EiV€ counsel, the 9:113’ point that arises fer
: cansidaiation is:
L
/
“Whether the armmnt awarded by the Referenqe Court
is just and praper?”
7. After carefu} evaluation of the ‘.
reccrrtis, What emerges is that, _§3:ae__ Refei’éziCé._v i§_£1$ _
committal a grave ermr and proésed;%;d~’io f2.::;s’s _theV@:{rd1éVi?.Tl::>§;
taking the yicid of T111″ as 4 ;;;’i3§1::ta1″é1<:I'(5:»b.:'(f£j»v:;;'i;z?a;jf,?–v3to Vthsti *
Yield Certficate-Ex.P14, whe;f{§}i1.. -32$ sp§éCii7ic§§l1}rV?st.ated that
the maximum yiaid pa-fV:Vh¢c'§_ar<2;f guptas and minimum
yield per hectare is g1.;;;1::a§s.A& of the matter
has pegs ggfieeéea :9 take the yieki of "Fur
at 4 ,;":a.3::3:1oi be justifiable. Therefere,
we can :$3fg:;3§;v £fié'z;:§€mge yitzld of Tut at 6 Quinta} per
I» 2 _____
Tribunal has further ca-mmitted an anothrssr
* ciiror deduction 0f 30% towards cast of cultivation
cf efiry land, which carmot be sustainaizzie.
, A' 'i'§!§re§§m5 we take {.116 COS'{ of cultivation at 409%»
i. The yieid of Jowar is taken at 6 Quinta} per acre
as gar E3xrP}4~ yield (373 ' Gate and the price list as §€I'
.»no*""""W-Mm'
EXPIS. The pf'iC€3S of Jowar and Tur is Rs.6Si5}'–.: anéi
Rs.22SO] ~ per quintal respeciivelyz Thertifozwe, fiif
quinta} Jowar at the rate of Rs.650/ ~ per
Rs.3,900[~ anti fxirmer if we €133
price czf 4 {tart load Jawar Fodder rate» ;,§;AE?s,,'~.b:pt:~rV
cart load, tbs total amcnmt cages ta {lg,§3j{}(:,_/ $6
far as Jawar is concemgé.
In so far a§;V_’§’uV1f ii; c:§;)née:méfc.1,._ -the rah: of T121″ is
Rs.2,2::’3G/ – a11:i””Ehé”3ri€i{i =is:..i:%;1ken at 6 quinta} per
acre, ‘thm. L ‘the i;gm1″ — ~sr_;:t33″*a€$” ti§ ‘ R3. 13,599; » (Rs-..225€}X 5
q:1i1it:;*::_§).” V the neat amount Comes its
E1’3.18,4~fi§(3fi¥ par’ acrij. S of this, 46% is éeéucied towards
c’g2£ivai{io:1.;….£§1en the amauxzt cames ta Rs.11,040/-
‘ multiplier appiicabk; is; ’10’ and; if the samé is
” cemes to Rs.1,2(},4(}O_!»~ per acre ifistsaé of
R§.3;55′;{);0{};l~ per amt awagzdsd by the Refftmnce Ceurt.
9, in the iight caf thé facts and Ci.¥°C”{l}3iStaIiC€S of 11118
case as statsfi above, the apspeai filed by 11136: appallants 11$
éismissed as écvofi of 11:1 ‘:8 and the cmssvohjectiems filed
by the ciajmants stamis dispeséed of by
commen. judgmént and award passed by thr: Rt.”;’i!f(f;::*I'{‘:I;_1:’¢E’3.’:..:”3v£T}*¥_:J.;.E”!l’
in so far as it relates ta Sy.No.99f2A»V 150 an ‘é:§<;;'1?§i*§'::{£; (sf "2 a cr:c*3 K x
holéing that the croa-;s~object0rs lam
R31, 10,40(}/- per acre as ag2ii;i'st R$.'3fi,V:(}Q{:§;[; g
10. The crassk;-hjactafié ‘1i:f:’3;”mitt:é(i” iié pay the
cleficit Court fee regarding.’1§i1éL’v’e§{1§1at3§6:5§.ja:i3z;gount within ‘Ewe
weeks from fnsday’_’–an€i_ u§.i::jfa~”3<§tr:d to accejgt the I
same: and éfiéraw tiié ..g1écQi*dii3.g1jg Q
sd/-*
JUDGE
%%%%% gé/u
3333
‘?£,Er;rn V ‘ ”