High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri Huchappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 5 February, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Sri Huchappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 5 February, 2009
Author: N.K.Patil


:22: um II1GEE<Z'{}URT 0:? xaaxxrmza 9;: xaamza, game sf arm

-3.

cf Repeat Act, 1999, petiticne: is entitied ta ire-::ire$”s his

grievance mfaare the campeient authority, if the iands

were phygicaiiy ramained with €)Wf’E6FS and wfih reftgfefiaaj

to Wham no c€m1pens.3tion is paid. Tharefera, _

has flied h%s appficaticm we Anndgxure-$x””i<éi%c;~fé':i the V

Additéenfi Spacsiat Beputy Co1nmi::=s},$%<::'§erj'V

K_P_Wect, 8anga}am~20 £n mL%L:k2,c.A%{9fl) 51:3

pursuance of the said a-;;pfica&t§a'3r ; res{p'cnd;e:'§3t has

§ssued notice it: we Taréégiaarsg. 1L1je.A::*%'j:z::;:)1 cailifig for
the report. making spot
inspectiégj mahazar has submitted

his repert ':§:i14__415,QVL'2£§C§5?_ same is avaiiabie in the

.'…{srigi:j3e!i:§. 'vféagrdéy "p=§<;:fi_§;<:e§ by the Seamed Gavemmant

*.;P§ééetent authority has net taken my

‘decision $6: far. Therefore, in View 0f %rsa<::'ti:;:m on the part

' tfgjurisdictianai competent authcrify Er: no? taking any

h and dismséng fhe appiication fébd by

Eh' TEE II§G§§f3€'3{§§?.'1' OF E.é'aR;'€.FiT5kK§LAT B.1%.NG:%L€}§?.E "w3vi§*.}~§0. Eifiéfl fif 3&3

{N THE Eflfiil CEOIERT <32? KAREATAKA AT fi.=*u""~§G?sLQRE1 W 15'.Ni3. i=$i}4(1 sf 2i}{38

-5.

$532091 véde Annexure-E, swing that in fact, the

petfianer was in pamxwsien of the Sand in quast%«:§§i;:’f”L:«¥f”‘.._’

that is sex, the petitioner is enfifieri ta

grievance as pmvided under the Regfiéfiiéd ‘_Az;:t §sn réf;er;”‘eACi

abcwe. But the application flied by peii!iianei; .’V_;’;§”A’ lat-:it’?1 é§r~. “‘

mnsidered nor ciispasad of so
igrhe petitioner in abeyars$ _if«.by ‘:§Vi’i’t¥§V%1i’i’t3t is
net at aft justfiiatfie. any
opinion can Suffice for this
Court, to to the competent
at}thG£’it}[ t{) filed by the petiiicner

and dispcse (5% fi1a,sanée;

siamitjg r§ga*rfi’io the fmts and circumstances ef

€39″ 4V%’$f§f:ed above, the writ petition fiied by

. p3{if:a;:fV’cer_ ef, with a d¥rectEon tn the ccsmgzaeftefit

cm-sider the appiimiirim fifid by petitioner

d§*,~§pwe of the same, as peditiaausiy as passébie, at

EN “£132; {W312 £Z'{}i}RT £3? KARI€ATF».KA 9;’? 3£&=iG?x1.{3R}Ti ‘J:r’.,P§-51.; ‘utffiéil C-f $3