High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri Shekar Shetty vs Mr Y Ananthapadmanabha Bhat on 2 March, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Sri Shekar Shetty vs Mr Y Ananthapadmanabha Bhat on 2 March, 2010
Author: Anand Byrareddy


W-..» Eli’ Mmmam mun COURT or KARNATAKA Has:-a (SOUR? or mg~A}X’kZ”‘”W

HEGH 5*

3: am mam cam? av KAR.Nzfl’AI§A AT mmegg % %
mum “I”I~fi3’I’I-m mrm Dfif cs? I\.%€I»£’f2:§93g@ V ” ‘

asmm:

Tm H{}N’BLE am .1t:s’rIGE 35 392*

REC%I.3’IAR swarm 5 j g~He.323; <3"?

BE EN' :

3:; Shaw Efmttg A
3/3 1atse:Pad&1z?_’$i’;e?;?4513i 4′
Residmt uf ‘
P1-1’1i}”&¥% «.

Udupi ‘y§9’..’ht33F§, ‘:. ‘”VI::, ;’;;;~§’:}’FELi.a&m

{By H fidsacate}

v’ V. 3 Efmtig

mama: ?aym
3.83:: Ehat,

}’€:é.ss§§§;::€:- «ti?

mi’ 55;’

L §}é2;1§§.’F&§i.iE§.

4′ Sf

_ élcmmfi’ mm;

‘zigzag: mmt,

–« .¢ V V'{}’¢1?§.:pi

39fis$§$’$&:’2t Examgtiva E fi§§
Pufiiifi figarim ‘Q
Ra-.3; $1§§~§§¥§§§§3fi?

P£3§_f¢i:.1§.2%;

3

§~EIvrAm men

.. ……………w. I-Hun wuxr or KARNATAKA HIGH COURT oe=’1EA’n”

“if ‘A $136 Fiifii Apgseflate Sam: haviig

EMF

4. Tim Exacutiva Engnwxg
?§.1b}1’c ‘iiiorém D¢ t,

Uéupi.

(By Shri.K.S3Vya§a Rae, fisdvevwtcz fist».
rwpondant-}., A. 3
Shri Ramakmfira Fz.’.?Ia.1’k; C:f?;¥_.3i’$v ” ~ ‘~
nt Pleam far 1-aspr313fima7f.,33-43V ” ”

agan-2.3% _

mag 12~2@;.1ax- is”–f’;Ied same’ :1
1% cf Cofie af Civi}, against the
judgment amt cimrw c:’§ate:3s” 2_’..?g(3Q.;2{§_G8 passaci in
R.A.2’$¢£i8]2GQ*§~.. an E?Z”.xa6=f3Z3 sf .’:]::¢ Judgefsatzinr
sfliivisfarz} pgrtky the apgl fikd
agafmat ti’ae,§is.ifig¢5%Ii1;§nt’« dated 34.02.2004
paasad in C?.S._}5i2::z.’%s3; ‘—-€§;§’k tbs fiie sf the Principal
‘CW 53%.? A%E’i?fi’?§¥ii3
._ — _ Awml an fizz’
afimksicitz Em day, f_’;..”1sC”€’:§i:3:¢t éalfiéi tha foibwi;tg:…

‘ “”” far tlm apwllarztg

was fiefmfiflazxt mm were tim trisi

Samtg Essa gait fir

fa § whifih was wwtsd an

.; ‘$23 wig} (Emir: d;a.m& the suit

.:-.__.-3; the smg,

“as aémftmdlgrg the 312$? ahaw wwfi an trim maé

– ma an pgghiia ting gsrmarzi aipmal is fiimi

5

sxkmée miss the ibiiawizzg qumtigns as

5 quwfinng 9? law:

“{i}°Whaat}1cr the Caum bfi1ef;€””wer¢

in passing a magma:

clafezldant rm.-4» wm f;

pezfiency af the suit _r3.11.fiit§_V’Ai1.{

egg fifkw? V
g;2;wrm1m the gxmnwm

in at the
a%Ha11t{_’gs:}:g “fl*1:e4_’;i1_i1’i!:%é’§:.%v2:i01’1 ef the

qimarmfiig tt*§:jzgi«.§3e:§i::”:;Vw:s;=;as gmmzea in

,T>is3’a.i§t*«..v§’=1*£ezz thaw was an
rmedy that was
assgaihfiie ufidafv. pzfivisiarm at’ the

P:*emi3m{Evéc:f£.§3:1 sf

Qz:c:,2pah?an;&ct and the

. … ..n…………. .—….n ..uu.u Ur mmmmm n-may COURT or KARNATAXA ms» count or mefiggca HIGH ca

% Eewrzuefict?

L’ »._{1iv3 the gig: $5221″: was gmzim in

131$ suit impita srf ax: maprws
A’ ‘ uzfiaz tag aéatuta 13$
A Staéa?”

izmsfar 33 2113 Est qumfian 5m am::u::m:rwd; iiw

5

.nm…. ..-…,n Wu.” Ur mm».mxA mew COURT or KARNATAKA WWW

IGH CC

” 1 f – .§#:.:;as§gé:-:,,§%mt

data sf thc judgemzzt and tfzcreferfig tbs

afimaa fer mnsideratiaxz.

insasfar as the smut! q¥;.If&§%;§?JI3. aii:
aczanxmt fie sairi that the Civil
jurisfiicfian 12:: addzmaizg a’v§x.i*»’.._V_i’a:v;e*[¥’*. .: ‘fiery V’

tha Stats Gfiwrmmt Wfiifi made
as ts in; in
aewrfiaxzcc lmci been driven

49$ tifgé £3 asmarnad, them is

13.9 a§¥:2e_Vrm§s’ia.=2V_::*asm;fif,}*.a;§é’#i}i¢abI5e m the §Zaim¥:ifi’ under the

:3? uxmufiwrwfi

was paasébly 5: statute mm: which

§ témtisalsa rm’: 5:.

far €¥$fmid;§”$.fifi$1.

as tfm %w€h qmmfiéan is mmmzeég tin’: iris

was ma mmgetmii E6 quxtizm. an

‘A ” “a% amimzxt an Ezsefmii 52’ the Etats is mnmrnzaé, is: mt

iwmbifig Since éfzszzre was an izxterfit {sf tim ayfiaiiantg

mum Luum ur Ixmtwnwuul ruun Lg:-gw Ur KAKNAIARB HIUH Luuxv ur IU-\KlV£!\l!\lU-I rllufi uuulu ur IKAKNAIAILH |”HUl”‘l Luuxr or ncnxngnqgux fi§GH cg

refmfi It aarmi; ha mid that it was mzfiteky a ma€gfi§*:’jf¢’r. v
the Stahg which was mug}: to k .
suit. Aemrdirw, ms su?s$tamfaIvc’;_z:ss431;iex:.’_'”§$f
for wxwidwafion in tbe appeal

$3”