High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

Rakesh Kamboj vs Ranjive Dalal on 17 February, 2009

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Rakesh Kamboj vs Ranjive Dalal on 17 February, 2009
      IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                     CHANDIGARH



                                                   COCP No.1507 of 2008
                                       Date of decision: February 17, 2009


Rakesh Kamboj

                                                          .....PETITIONER
                                  Versus

Ranjive Dalal, the Director General of Police, Haryana


                                                        .....RESPONDENT

CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE T.P.S.MANN

PRESENT: None for the petitioner.

Mr. S.K.Hooda, Sr Deputy Advocate General, Haryana
for the respondent.

T.P.S.MANN, J. (Oral):

Reply filed on behalf of the respondent today in the Court is

taken on record.

On 26.3.2008, while issuing notice of motion in Cr. Misc. No.

M-7648 of 2008 filed on behalf of the petitioner for providing him security,

a direction was issued to the respondent to provide adequate security to the

petitioner as warranted by the circumstances. The petitioner then filed

COCP No.561 of 2008, as according to him, the respondent was sitting tight

over the matter because of certain extraneous considerations. This petition

came up for hearing on 21.4.2008, when a direction was issued to the

respondent to restore the same set of police personnel as was earlier
provided to the petitioner. The petitioner still claimed that no security had

been given to him. Accordingly, he filed the present petition under Sections

11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act.

Learned State counsel submits that Cr. Misc. No.M-7648 of

2008 filed on behalf of the petitioner stands disposed of by this Court on

22.1.2009 by directing the respondent to consider the threat perception to

the petitioner and then to take a decision whether security was to be

provided to him or not. It has also been submitted that COCP No.561 of

2008 was also disposed of on 1.5.2008 and the rule discharged in view of

the stand of the respondent that three constables, who were earlier attached

with the petitioner as gunmen had been restored to him.

Learned State counsel further submits that in view of the final

order passed by this Court on 22.1.2009 in Cr. Misc. No. M-7648 of 2008,

the assessment of threat perception to the petitioner was considered by the

respondent, who obtained reports from Superintendent of Police, Karnal and

District Inspector, CID, Karnal, both of whom sent their reports that there

was no threat perception to the life and liberty of the petitioner. It has,

however, been submitted that till date three police constables, who had

earlier been attached with the petitioner as gunmen are still continuing to

provide security to him.

In view of the above, it cannot be said that orders dated

26.3.2008 and 21.4.2008 passed by this Court have not been complied with

by the respondent.

The petition has been rendered infructuous and is, accordingly,

disposed of. Rule is discharged.

However, keeping in view the fact that the petitioner is an Ex-
M.L.A, who was earlier in Congress-I and now joined another political

faction and that according to him, he was stopped on 1.12.2007 and given

merciless beatings by the police, as a result of which, he suffered multiple

injuries, a direction is issued to the respondent to provide atleast one police

constable for the security of the petitioner. These directions shall be open to

review after the expiry of a period of one year from today.

February 17, 2009                                  (T.P.S.MANN)
Pds.                                                 JUDGE