‘I’ribu3:1a} or the rcspsndent opposing the tfig
grotmd of limitation.
5. In compliance fihe °§) f£:Ii_§:r-…0§’3 stVay~.
dated 16~11-2006, the to have
depasited 12s.2,S(},(v)iE.>.{)’/.+ 50% of the
amount in dispuxte, %’rovide1’1t Fund
Coxnulissifgyzaéx} disputed by the
Icamed V;:oLi:1$<':I"1f;;1:_:1'1§i r§spen.d.<3i1t.
"£136 directions issued to the
Centrai (3r§i%€f1'11I1.r§12%: '-i1§ W¢P.N0, 14378/2006 (33.9. 19..
the for 2. Writ of mandalnus is
L–..1:ii1_1-'26: ' c.éi&:$a1*y~. . V .9
AA petitioner is at iibsrty $30 institute an appeal
the EFF Appellate Tribunal and if so dune Within
-»fe;;:r weeks from ioday, I1eit11er the Tribunal nor the
I”‘f3S13€}I1{3§€i’1£ shall insist on the point of linzitatiomn and
the petjtionar is antitled to the benefit of the izztezfim
M
ziircier étdk 1611-2006 until such M
Appcilate Tribunal oonsidcrs a11c1-‘jjagsass
application for stay, in the app€:a3. _ A