Gujarat High Court Case Information System
Print
CR.MA/7814/2010 3/ 3 ORDER
IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
CRIMINAL
MISC.APPLICATION No. 7814 of 2010
=========================================================
RAKESH
DHANSUKHBHAI TADVI
Versus
STATE
OF GUJARAT
=========================================================
Appearance
:
MRHARSHADKPATEL
for
Applicant
MR AJ DESAI ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for
Respondent
=========================================================
CORAM
:
HONOURABLE
MR.JUSTICE Z.K.SAIYED
Date
: 27/07/2010
ORAL
ORDER
This
application is filed under section 439 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure by the applicant who has been arrested in connection with
C.R. No. I – 17 of 2010 filed before Garudeshwar Police Station,
for the offence punishable under sections 376, 354, 451 and 551 of
the Indian Penal Code.
Mr.Harshad
Patel, learned advocate for the applicant submitted that the
applicant is an innocent person and a false case is foisted on him.
He submitted that there is no medical evidence / history stating that
the applicant has committed rape on the prosecutrix. It appears that
the prosecutrix is not examined. In any case, there is no external or
internal injury on the prosecutrix. He submitted that the prosecutrix
is adult lady and having three children. Therefore, no ingredients of
offence under Section 376 of IPC is made out against the applicant.
He submitted that the applicant is falsely implicated in the crime in
question with oblique and ulterior motive to harass the applicant. He
submitted that there are no reasonable grounds to believe that the
applicant has committed any offence which is punishable either with
death or with imprisonment for life. He submitted that considering
the role attributed to the applicant and reflected in the FIR at
Annexure ‘A’ to the application, this is a fit case to enlarge the
applicant on regular bail.
As against
the aforesaid, learned APP Mr.A. J. Desai submitted that considering
the role played by the applicant, no discretionary relief can be
granted to the applicant, and the application deserves to be
dismissed.
Having
heard the rival submissions of learned advocates and having
considered the role attributed to the applicant and reflected in the
FIR at Annexure A, the quantum of punishment etc., I am of the view
that the the applicant is required to be enlarged on regular bail at
this stage on stringent conditions, without entering into the merits
of the case and without discussing the evidence in detail.
The
parties do not press for further reasoned order.
In the
facts and circumstances of the case, the application is allowed and
the applicant is ordered to be enlarged on bail in connection with
C.R. No. I – 17 of 2010 filed before Garudeshwar Police Station,
on his executing a bond of Rs.10,000/- [Rupees Ten thousand only]
with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial
court and subject to the conditions that he shall:
[a] not
take undue advantage of his liberty or abuse his liberty;
[b]. not
act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;
[c]. surrender
his passport, if any, to the lower court within a week;
[d]. not
leave the State of Gujarat without the prior permission of the
Sessions court concerned;
[e]. furnish
the present address of his residence to the I.O. and also to the
Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change his
residence without prior permission of this Court;
[f]. maintain
law and order.
If breach
of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge
concerned will be free to issue warrant or to take appropriate action
in the matter.
Bail bond
to be executed before the lower Court having jurisdiction to try the
case.
At the
trial, the trial Court shall not be influenced by the observations of
preliminary nature, qua the evidence at this stage, made by this
Court while enlarging the applicant on bail.
Rule is
made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct Service is
permitted.
(Z.K.SAIYED,
J.)
(vijay)
Top