Gujarat High Court High Court

=========================================Appearance vs Mr on 8 October, 2010

Gujarat High Court
=========================================Appearance vs Mr on 8 October, 2010
Author: Ravi R.Tripathi,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCA/6622/2010	 2/ 2	JUDGMENT 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 6622 of 2010
 

 
For
Approval and Signature:  
 
HONOURABLE
MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI
 
=========================================
 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

1
		
		 
			 

Whether
			Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

2
		
		 
			 

To
			be referred to the Reporter or not ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

3
		
		 
			 

Whether
			their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

4
		
		 
			 

Whether
			this case involves a substantial question of law as to the
			interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order
			made thereunder ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

5
		
		 
			 

Whether
			it is to be circulated to the civil judge ?
		
	

 

=========================================
 

GHANSHYAMBHAI
G BHATT 

 

Versus
 

UNITED
INDIA INSURANCE CO AND OTHERS 

 

=========================================Appearance
: 
MR SN SHELAT,
SR ADVOCATE with MR SJ GAEKWAD
for the Petitioner  
MR
RH MEHTA, with MR VIBHUTI NANAVATI for Respondent(s) : 1 - 3. 
DS
AFF.NOT FILED (N) for Respondent(s) :
3, 
=========================================
 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 08/10/2010 

 

ORAL
JUDGMENT

Learned
advocate Mr. R.H. Mehta with Mr. Vibhuti Nanavati states that the
petitioner will be allowed to avail the service of Shri P.D. Munshi,
retired Deputy Manager, as his defence assistance in the departmental
proceedings. On this statement being made, the grievance of the
petitioner does not survive and the petition is disposed of
accordingly.

Rule
is made absolute to the aforesaid extent.

(RAVI
R.TRIPATHI, J.)

omkar

   

Top