High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Suresh Ram vs State Of Bihar on 5 July, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Suresh Ram vs State Of Bihar on 5 July, 2010
                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Cr.Misc. No.15357 of 2010
                        SURESH RAM SON OF LATE HARICHARAN RAM
                                             Versus
                                      STATE OF BIHAR
                                           -----------

3. 5.7.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the

offence under Section 364A of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that the petitioner is not named

in the first information report and subsequently the victim was

recovered from the house of the petitioner’s brother. The only

material that has transpired against the petitioner is that he

happened to be the brother of Jawahar Ram, from whose house

the victim was recovered.

In view of such, let the petitioner above named, who is

in custody since 1.10.2009 and has no criminal antecedents, be

released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five

thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

satisfaction of Sri B.P.Singh, A.D.J., F.T.C.II, Buxar in S.Tr.No.4 of

2010 arising out of Buxar (M) P.S.case No.27 of 2009, subject to

the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of

the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how

he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish

information to the court about any change in the address of the

petitioner, (ii) that the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner

is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be

released on bail, (iii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that
-2-

he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in

any other case of similar nature after his release in the present

case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the

proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iv) that

the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police

papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge

and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in

any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of

misuse and (v) that the petitioner will be well represented on each

date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will

be liable to be cancelled.

( Anjana Prakash, J. )

Narendra/