High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

Malook Singh vs Joginder Singh & Another on 3 December, 2008

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Malook Singh vs Joginder Singh & Another on 3 December, 2008
 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH



                      Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-41305 of 2004
                                  Date of Decision: December 03, 2008


Malook Singh
                                                      .....PETITIONER(S)

                                  VERSUS


Joginder Singh & Another
                                                    .....RESPONDENT(S)
                              .     .      .


CORAM:            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA


PRESENT: -        Mr. S.P.S. Sidhu, Advocate, for the
                  petitioner.


                              .     .      .

AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral)

                 On    perusal      of     the   documents      placed

before me, it transpires that the matter had earlier

come upto this Court on the same issue. Vide Order

dated 21.4.1998 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous

No.14262-M of 1997, the matter was remitted back to

the Magistrate. It was clarified that the Sub

Divisional Magistrate who is seized of the matter,

shall consider the complaint made by the respondents

and take evidence led by the parties if any and then

record a finding that some public nuisance exists

and pass a conditional order directing the present

petitioners to remove that nuisance within the time

fixed by him. In case the Sub Divisional Magistrate

finds that no public nuisance exists, natural
Crl. Misc. No. M-41305 of 2004 [2]

consequences would follow.

The Sub Divisional Magistrate, clearly,

vide Order dated 10.5.1999 has concluded that there

was no public nuisance and Section 133 Cr.P.C. would

not be applicable to the facts and circumstances of

the case.

On perusal of the order, I find that

detailed reasons have been given therein. Revision

was carried against order dated 10.5.1999, however,

in revision, the order of the Sub Divisional

Magistrate has been upheld.

This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

is second revision which ordinarily cannot be

entertained. Learned counsel wants this Court to

reappreciate the material to come to a different

finding.

No ground for interference is made out.

The petition is dismissed.


                                                               (AJAI LAMBA)
December 03, 2008                                                 JUDGE
avin