High Court Kerala High Court

Sumesh vs State Of Kerala on 16 July, 2009

Kerala High Court
Sumesh vs State Of Kerala on 16 July, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl.MC.No. 2052 of 2009()


1. SUMESH, AGED 24 YEARS, S/O.AYYAPPAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY THE PUBLIC
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.DILEEP P. PILLAI

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR

 Dated :16/07/2009

 O R D E R
             M.Sasidharan Nambiar, J.
            --------------------------
              Crl.M.C.No.2052 of 2009
            --------------------------

                       ORDER

Petitioner is the accused in Crime No.361/2009

of Palarivattom Police Station, now pending as S.T.

No.993/2009 on the file of Judicial First Class

Magistrate’s Court-I, Ernakulam, taken cognizance

by the Magistrate on Annexure-A1 final report for

the offences under Section 279 of Indian Penal Code

and under Section 185 of Motor Vehicles Act. This

petition is filed under Section 482 of Code of

Criminal Procedure to quash the proceedings

contending that he is an Advocate Clerk by

profession and ingredients of the offences are not

made out and in such circumstances, the case is to

be quashed.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner

argued that in the absence of materials to prove

presence of alcohol in the blood exceeding 30 mg/

100 at the time of the arrest, an offence under

CRMC 2052/09 2

Section 185 of Motor Vehicles Act will not lie and

in such circumstances, the case is to be quashed.

The offence alleged is not only under Section 185

of Motor Vehicles Act, but under Section 279 of

Indian Penal Code also. It cannot be said that, on

the allegations raised in the final report, an

offence under Section 279 of Indian Penal Code is

not attracted. In such circumstances, I do not find

any reason to quash the proceedings as sought for.

Petitioner is at liberty to raise all the

contentions before the concerned Magistrate.

Petition is dismissed.

16th July, 2009 (M.Sasidharan Nambiar, Judge)
tkv