IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
RP.No. 734 of 2009(I)
1. THE PRINCIPAL,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. AMRUTHA VENUGOPAL, D/O. VENUGOPAL,
... Respondent
2. THE DIRECTOR,
3. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY
For Petitioner :SRI.B.S.SWATHY KUMAR
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN
Dated :31/07/2009
O R D E R
S.SIRI JAGAN, J.
==================
R.P.No.734/2009 &
W.P.(C).No.19832/2007
==================
Dated this the 31st day of July, 2009
J U D G M E N T
The 3rd respondent in the writ petition has filed this review
petition seeking review of my judgment dated 30.6.2009 in the writ
petition. The contention is that in the judgment I had directed that the
admission given to the petitioner in the writ petition pursuant to the
interim order, would be treated as regular and the respondents shall
permit the petitioner to complete the course as if she was validly
admitted. The contentions raised by the petitioner in the review
petition is that the petitioner in the writ petition has never turned up
for admission pursuant to the interim order and the course is also
over. Therefore, there is no point in directing that the petitioner be
allowed to complete the course as if she was validly admitted.
The petitioner in the writ petition does not dispute the fact that
she did not join the course as permitted by the interim order. It is also
not disputed that the course itself is over. That being so, there is no
point in directing that the admission of the petitioner be treated as
regular and allowing the petitioner to complete the course as if she
was validly admitted. Accordingly, I recall the judgment dated
30.6.2009 and dismiss the writ petition as infructuous.
Sd/-
sdk+ S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE
///True copy///
P.A. to Judge
2