High Court Kerala High Court

The Travancore Devaswom Board vs The Deputy Examiner on 23 December, 2009

Kerala High Court
The Travancore Devaswom Board vs The Deputy Examiner on 23 December, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

DBA.No. 159 of 2009()


1. THE TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE DEPUTY EXAMINER,LOCAL FUND AUDIT,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.N.VENUGOPALA PANICKER, SC, TDB

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.R.RAMAN
The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON

 Dated :23/12/2009

 O R D E R
          P.R. RAMAN & P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JJ.
              ................................................................................
                          D.B.A. No. 159 OF 2009
              .........................................................................
                 Dated this the 23rd December, 2009

                                          O R D E R

P.R. Raman, J:

This application is filed for sanction for finalization of

auction conducted by Anirudheswaram Devaswom under

Thiruvalla Group of Travancore Devaswom Board in respect of

licensing of room Nos. 4 and 6 of shopping complex attached to

the Devaswom. The application is supported by an affidavit

filed by the Secretary of the Board. It is averred that quotations

were received in respect of the rooms in question and that the

quotation for the rooms other than room No.6 was lower than the

previous amount. The auction for room No.6 was closed in

favour of one Padmanabhan for Rs. 1020/- per month as

against Rs.650/-. Re-auction was conducted in respect of other

rooms. There was nobody in the auction and since the

quotations received in respect of the rooms other than room No.4

were less than the previous year, the auction in respect of those

rooms were adjourned. The auction in respect of room No.4

D.B.A. No. 159 OF 2009

2

was confirmed in respect of one Dr.K. Ravi, since quotation was

received for Rs.1255/- as against Rs.1015/- of the previous

year. Details of the tender are furnished in paragraph No.5 of

the affidavit, stating that nobody has offered more than what is

offered by the aforesaid persons.

In the above facts and circumstances, sanction is accorded,

as sought for.

P.R. RAMAN,
JUDGE.

P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON,
JUDGE.

lk