High Court Karnataka High Court

Archaka vs The Principal Secretary’ on 5 January, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Archaka vs The Principal Secretary’ on 5 January, 2010
Author: Anand Byrareddy


___”-{)7~2.{){)9v.pi1ssed in Writ Petimm l(}299/2()()7, on the file of the
xfHnm’1h”—b’lc High CULII1()f’K£1l”I1é1EL1kLi, Bang:.1f<..):'@.

= -CUIIIT made I:h'c: Ik_)llowi11g: ~

'._,_m _'

ix.)

. The Cu:'11111issi<)nca' for Hindu,
Relig.ion.x' & C,'.l'm1*i1z':hh–': E11dov\–mt-311:5.
M ah: M ahaidexhwaa1'u BLuilcEi11g.g.
('h;1m:.-11';z'j;1pc1"

8;:11ga1h)r:: — 560!) E 9.

J

2. TheDeputyCnmmissi()1’é\-vmarlals. Chi:’.sj:1’dr.11*ga. ‘ T’
District: ChitradL1z”g21.,—-. ”

4. Thif Tah:;1sifda11′. ._
M0fk:;1fmur. C11_itu’;1ciL:yig=a,.. V
I)i;s:t1’i<;£: Chit:"':.u,iLnfg;1.L_ '

U1

. Sri. G. V;13'.11';i:fa-h'¢'a_._ V" J '
8/0. 'l_"_lV_1_j[v:11£i;)M;5;.a,;2;;___ _ _
Ag_jc:L} min-.: I _\:=Cl.;:"S. I
Ex. VC.'An11'-\-'c:n..r:1V".*if-»_ .
Sri. Ri.1gf'z:1vend.1fa't S'\Ixh::Vii:§{ '' :""£.1I1;)lc.
Shil'L1k()fV';i'~.,._ _ A' S *
M_nEk:1E1nL11' 'F:=t"l L1Vk'.'
mxlgigi: CE1i11';1{iL1r–ga." PONIDENTS

'' Petition is fit:-:d under ()a'de:' 47 Ruie E of {he
Civif"'P1'0a;c{iLiI"c: Cnchs. pmyilig for review of the Order dated ()7~

This Review Pelitism Colning on foa" ()rd<-zrs' this day. the

8

>». :. .§._.W.

.JJ

0 R D E R

The peiiiéamca’ has failed to c<_ampI_y–..\2§5'%I:Ii o_f'é"i€..e

I

obygeainnsi.

Heard the coumcl for the ?e£itiof’:c:”‘::I ]Ei]f.’_Zi’i §’VL’.f}(i th<§;1'eVi.~; _nl;.

(tame made: OLIE on merits. Hence. £4hepe£VEti<)11 '11: 1jC_jécted.

5.]