High Court Karnataka High Court

The Divisional Controller, vs Vithal S/O Beerappa Babaladi, on 23 October, 2008

Karnataka High Court
The Divisional Controller, vs Vithal S/O Beerappa Babaladi, on 23 October, 2008
Author: Dr.K.Bhakthavatsala

}¢i{§i~”x E’50.3{}229,:”2G{38

EN ‘””f’f~fE: mi};-i cz:m”~ {>13 }{A§€’N!a’E’i§§{A 7 Vi’

{,’,E§€{?E§E’E’ §3;’E2E’~§€?7%7C)E3-‘§§:R_ i2{3€§§:§

E3E3§?€)f{‘E§

_ W ______ __ ____ _______ _,_, ,,,___.,, ,, ,__,,,..,.,,._,… .. ………..-…-….-. mm. nu-run! ur n.nnIV.!-In-Inn mun uuuuu ur-nmcnmmnn ‘3-!It:’il*r'(:;0UKT GFKARNAIAKA BIGH (30

mm HGIWBLE DR. JusTIcE%3HA1;frH,a,Vgar:%;a;wa

MESCRLLI-W I:”3{)US yvrgsr A§>PE_Ai}: ~?mv..,302:9″; :2§{:g{Mv§

BETWEEN:

The Bivisional Cs21335f:;1Ec:3;L’V’ _. . ”
KSRTC, Guibafgag’ V. . ”

Summozzs {:3 bit segjiéii 53:;

The Diviaicrial ‘£3-Gn€m.Eer; *1; . –.
Bijagmr, {Bus Na. K159′ .7! _F’4’=’f:}i”:§*;?}’V ,

{B}; 831′ B K i~’zai{i{, Adv’; ffii”
Am): ‘ VV ‘ é ‘

8/ 0 E3;:e’i’ap’p.-a _Bs;baI:«:<i

Age: 45.}.»'Ea1"S, " « 'V

'£?::Vc:AgxiCu1ture_,_ L <

V RI 0 _{}anga7i3av:1di,'v
_ a.Ig{i.agi Buildvirig,

Bi} agar T11}.

.V 7 E$’ijap~:11″ Dizéizjct.

Prashanthkuxnar S GOEIEE’, &.dv., fa}:
[ [ Cgaszaatorj Respoxadeint)

Appeiiatzt

§2€$pGf::£3€:11i

_. . ..-.. ……… vr MMNAIAIA man COURT or KAIINATAKA HIGH couinr or KARNAIAKA HIGH co

MFA No.3_Q229x2oos

10. In the result, the Appeal fails and the

dismissed. The statutory amount of utiie

appellant in this case be transmitted tzfi ”

No costs.

In ge

Bjs