High Court Karnataka High Court

M/S Sunvik Steels Pvt Ltd vs Union Of India on 9 February, 2009

Karnataka High Court
M/S Sunvik Steels Pvt Ltd vs Union Of India on 9 February, 2009
Author: N.Kumar


” gfiaiing i;i§ié:t.v*——i;§1;z:< healing of the mattrrr would be

L?€)'.¥1~Z§vfiU§§j£,iv.,§::I4I1 :V2fi:§£I*.–;2G9?, 52:1 fantri €113 petitioner objactsd hi} the

' fhat: ii. 33,93 {fihief Ft/iizzzlster Wing wag heidmg the Pgrtfaiicr of
;¥f§'§:3fi€tf§;'§%§'§1(}V.:f1E1S to {'?'_"3I}Ci'£lC'E fhg hisazing, Tim said czrbjzsefixtm was
'-;ii£3i;V'"§'E¥i?(g¥3'[i£3E:i. Tim pfiifijozysr also submfirtati a zietafled pziajact

W :9 _,i:13tii3r its Claim for grami of zaizxing Image in its favcgzur,

cxjmpefiiive pI'.i{':f3 which has a sexious impact «:31:
003%, Tim State fiavemmgni issued a '
35:3,2i}03 11:14:15: R11}: 59(1) 0:? Mineraii iT;<;:;a4¢::es::iL:§:i
calbgag fcrtr appiicaticms f:rz' gfani
ptififianér appiietd £4.31" 323323 of ;

hfrxstares of land in    T311112,
8231833' ifiisfxiitt,     Ht1:1e_-:2 said
apfiiicafisrm, it   apgaijcaiigz:
that the mzinmg    captive pmrposes
since the    £31 £125 Spongsa iron

§?a¢:f.::2ry ‘Eh: patifienrzr anti that
fhfi mixzzs Qf oniy abiyut 10%} Kms

frcrm they factaiy of pE:fiti<:»§i¢:r; Thea: fikilli :'t:i$p«t.:rz1cie:1t issued

11::a:'-;:::Lg*?::;y mspgndeni. and it was their ctjzrxtemien

\/

mjeirfien sf his appiicatien to the pefifimner.
gc.:zi:1g into any other gztaunzis tirgfcggi' in file' "
c:h3.1II:=.;:1g'11g the ixnpuglsci exfiar, E A.
materiai irmgtflarity cotxpisci wzifi;.§»b1iqfia V

the iéase is s11fiicit::12i: tc: q:.12§é–;h_ that ' vjquesfian.

Accmldiizgiy E pasa the f€ri§§i1'iFi_.ng

Etfrit peiitzm. is .:;:za2m;::z,. "order is hemby
quashed. It «,2-i2iff;:}'z;:eV éffier grounds urged
in the writ to be agitated at the

ifi neeessmy.

£23., or::v.:1_:x;.’:’vfn_ =s£a~:r.« 2’3.-tirzieregf ta be ‘I€:r:;1
V .9 . ~.

S4/é.

Iudffe