Smt Munithayamma vs The State Of Karnataka on 18 October, 2010

1

IN THE max Comm' 012* KARNATAKA AT BANG~A.L@§E.._

Dated this the 1% day' ormmbm-, 20%;)  i    _

BEFORE 

nm HGIWBLE nmuusncp:   %

 

B EN : V A
   " '

Agad about 55   2. _ 
Rio    »
Jala Hcinli,  '_  

    '  

(By Sri cg Ad'-am;

 'V   _____ ..

 * " 5.3;:-,. '

 .  .A V T «~   ;'of Land Revenue

3  of Kamatalaa
"M S..__'B1z>'.Hing, fir. Ambedkar Veedhi
Bemgalnre -- 560 001

 

"  I  Special Daputy (Datum sianasr
 "Bangalom  Bangalore - 560 €309.
; m Tabsfidar

B%alort: Nc:rth(Add1.) Taluk

Y , Bangabre -- 560 {)6-4.
...R'esporfienm

(By Sri.  GA)

:,..,

at sf"



2

'rm writ petition is filed under Arvgozes 

227 of the Canafimtion of Imia, pmyixg to '_ 
csrder damd 23.10.2009 passed by the    
commissimm, Bangam-e I:):is1;:-ict,     ' *
i.e., the 2=*5 respondent vide 

1I1egal' axfivnfi ab--n11tm' ' ' .
hearing this day, the  

In th'm    prayed for a
writ in the  F"  aw xzardar dated
23.10.2®9'*  rwpomiem: as per
 of the petifioner f!'OII1

   ..... 

A’ 2. gievram cafthe petitioner is that the
7 to he paasw w1:tho’ ut servmsczae” of

.93.; hgér. ‘fixes lcarmd Gem-nment Adwcaw.

.« in connected matters this Court has met

ihe impugwd orders and remanded the matter to

second respondent fior fresh mnmd’ madam.

Aecxzerdingly flat: fcallcewing crrder:

¢-~.-

fin.