IN THE HIGH COURT OF KAEQNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 4"' my or NOVEMBER, 2010
BEFORE A
THE HON'BLE MRJUSTTCE MOHAN sHAmNra;éop::ge --
wan' PETITION No.25231or~= "
BETWEEN :
M/s. The Orientat Insurance V
Company Limited
Branch Office-1, Kulyadigr.
Buildings, K.S. Rao Road'
Hampanakatte " '
Mangaiore--575001
Through its Regionai Office"
No.44/45, ReséctehCi{.e,rF<oac*;._
Leo Shopping. .C0rnp'!fe_x_'_ *
Bar:gaiore--5E-O O_O'i_ ' . V
Rep by its_VDepu;y*Ma.r§ager'; V * ..Petitioner
(By sgri "as. Limc-as h, Ad v.,)
@ Bhanumathi
AW/0 £a.te5D.S. Manjunath
Aged--..'ab-ant 43 years
. VsE).S."f\l..ishanth
_ Sis fate D.S. Manjunath
' "Aged about 22 years
3. MD. Niveditha
D/0 late D.S. Manjunath
Aged about 19 years
R1 to R3 are residing at
No.48, "AMMA", 6"' Cross
Siddaganga Extension
Tumkur.
4. Sadashiva Rao
S/o late Umesh Rao
Manjunath Roadlines
Sri Beedu Complex
Uduph
5. M/s. Sanghu Transport Co., --
ACC Gate, Yadgirwatli * "
Gulbarga and also at, _
Vasnthali Shop Complex'
Hyderabad--50»O 070 . '
Rep by Managiing Diirector;
6. Nevljlndia VAssuv.ran{:e'-.C'o-;_, Lt-d.,
Alka ram .Rad--e Ce*nt're..__
Ramaganj; Secuntleraisad
Rep by D'i~visionVa.l £VE'van'a'ger. ..Respondents
V ul1'it._petiti0n is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of
tire Co_nst.itut"ion"of India, praying to call for records in Misc.
1'Eo.'.'38,/2008 Ex.No.342/2007 on the file of Pr}. Civil
Judge at
Writ petition coming on for preliminary hearing,
Tt1'1is_day"':--he Court made the foi1owing:-
ORDER
Notice to respondents is dispensed with 2
order to be Passed in this writ Petition
them.
2. MVC.No.704/2005
to 3 herein praying fo.r.flffgcertainhQ “a:mo.a;nt of
compensation in
the husband father of
claimants 2g’t’O””:.i§~.,V ca me to be allowed
on fog’.rtain”_”c’ornpensation in favour
of the Compam/~re5Dondent
No.3 _.in iViVC:V,i’Jo’,’–7(54/2005 was placed exparte,
“V”i’na’srri.L:3c’r.1’*’.as._it reniiained absent though served with
fisoticefi’ ‘ais~o_Cthe owner of the vehicle was placed
exparte. V___v”T.h41eAiInsurance Company flied Misc.Petition
before the MACT, Tumkur, praying for
ese’tti’ng”Aaside the exparte judgment and award. The
F’
-4-
matter is pending consideration since then. This__writ
petition is filed praying for a direction to the
Civil Judge and MACT, Tumkur, to hear and~-..’d’ispoTs’e” *
the application for stay filed Misc.’Pet«EtiA_o7n it
or in the alternative decide’ Misc4.’?_etit’ion
itself.
3. The matter before c;etii¥i;leeiow will be
decided bas_e3d’on’.’_Vth:eA p_r’i”ori’ty..:’an’d—-~Vwseniority of the
cases. be still pending
considerationlyl”b.efo’re”th”e.___Court below. In such an
event priority calnnotl to the petitioner.
‘ _ it may, since Misc.Petition No.38/2008
2008, same needs to be decided early
7._on n’1eri’ts,v since the execution petition filed by the
“{clairri~ants is being pressed.
l/>
-5″
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of
with a direction to the Principal Civil Judge anci«ji~’i2x§I:’F’,”
Tumkur to decide Misc.Pei:it:ion No.38-,{:20O’SV;’:.i:”‘”aj§¥A”V
expeditiousty as possible.
ck/11k»