IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CWJC No.986 of 2011
BIHAR CRICKET ASSOCATION
Versus
BANK OF INDIA & ORS
-----------
06/ 07.03.2011 Mr. Jitendra Singh, senior advocate appears in court
and submits that there is no retained counsel for the Board of
Control for Cricket in India (respondent no.6) in the Patna High
Court, hence, a notice may be directly sent to the said respondent
no.6 so that it may engage a counsel for the instant case.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is
ready to serve notice on respondent no.6 by Dasti summons for
which he seeks permission of the court.
In the said circumstances, let notice be issued to
respondent no.6 by both processes, i.e. by registered post as well as
by Dasti summons by the petitioner, for which requisites etc. must
be filed by the petitioner within one week, failing which this writ
petition as against it shall stand dismissed without further reference
to a Bench.
Put up this case under the same heading retaining its
position on 04th of April, 2011.
(S. N. Hussain, J.)
Sunil