High Court Karnataka High Court

Nagaraja @ Auto Naga vs State Of Karnataka on 3 February, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Nagaraja @ Auto Naga vs State Of Karnataka on 3 February, 2009
Author: N.Ananda
IN THE HIGH Comm' 0:»? ;{ARNA7g£xKA A*r, 3gN:}A§,e,§2;;$" ' _ 

DMED THIS THE 03% D53 C1F F'.E B~R¥3AR§f.".2'Q'G';5 V   

BEFO   .

THE HOINPBLE :z\,}i.:2..m;~3*:**1t:%.;*:; LA'NArs::?)A' 

CRIMINAL PETITEQN 'N0}2'?(}_£:2¥'}GF3'b'ti§/Vii

cR_1:sAi1}\:AL 13i':19i';'I'IE1*§'gf3i\£.::i¢z§°.'_;22¢%'/ ':3-3'O9

CRIMINAL "2'24g£'2'3'0'§'. V  _  V
BETWEEN:   = " * ._  «_ 
Mr.      

Si 0. A'C1fhiI1113jj§'vb?l Cicséstda. 'V  _

Aged 35  "  M   
Agricu1tur'r::fE"   '.  

R ,' 0, Mak}<::iE§2?=.i'1i1,.V Kcfi-Izaizdiztj
"£'he6rEi1€:£1aiii'I"a£ui<V.  " '

 Siihnoga i}i.strict§ "  _ 'V

 (Sy  !'.4vS;..P._z'a3n0€£ C-};1anc1z'a 55 P1ai<:ash.}'v§.,

Iris .r:'ié1V:~.§i1"rsz.?§£;:,;»;;1=*I:§jj'*i'*i*ioI~: N0.f2?(}f 2009

V V' _BE'I"vi'r'--B1EEH';' -. 

 Nagaraja  Auto Naga
 _ '~S§;'o. {i'idd.<: C-owda
' [.A'g:d'--f3?3 years
 __ "'Ag1ficu1tuz*i:a:t 33:, Auto Drivar
 T  '=§£.f.<,). ofmakkiimilu, i{0na11(i'u.:'
' ' --  A " ¥T1.1i1"E,}1{1h€1Hi Taluk
" ~ " Shimoga £3'-isf.'ri<:t.

(By Sn' K.A.Cha11d:*as11ekam, Advecatc}

. , . Pefiti011er

Advoc.-arcs)

Petitioriaer



IN-J

RWD:
State of Karnataka 
By Tlfirihahalli Poiice

Shimoga District.

Through the State P1113310 Pibsecuto
High Gourt Building   ._ ' _ 2  
Bangalore. }";.._R'z:sp0m:£c: 11f' is': cefgmon
  'in bc:£:}::" }3r3ttit:i;3;§1s
{By Sri H0n.na..ppa, I~ii"3GP}_ «_ 

These petitions am fiied xiiicftrr 438 Cr.P.C.,
praying to enlarge Lbs pctitiéixcfs t}n,'b_a:l1  the event of their
arms: in CIime§~E\ic'u.:3 f19fi2GU§3» air '§'.1';i1'ii1a}3a}1i Ponce Statioxx,
Shimoga, mgi:?ta?ret'?; f<)r~.(§fi'e13s;:es__.--pi1nishéiB1e under inaction
:30? r/W 34 IFS.     '  ..

'I'h«:Sé"'   ::§:i"'i'"e?iz1gi'«._  '

ma _p€t:rZut:3:-mfzr  Petition No.224j;?;{}O9 is

  2{:§"3é{>1:;sed  and petitiener in Criminal Petition

'VN0V.xiZ'_'E'{3j \a1":s:'a3:'v::€i as accused No.2 in Crime

N03Ai.9J/ 20%}-8:,L'4§'.réVgistered for an offence pllnishable uncier

 ~ '~__ sx:c'Ein  rjw 34 IPC, by Teetrthahalfi Police.

   f haw: hearci the, 1621111821 Ccaunsel for petitioners and

 "1211:-:5 iaamcd HCGP for State.  T Cfi
 mac; x t'»'7'"""" 'W ».

 



. 3. As per first ixxfannation given by the injured, fiicrc

was certain mo:1eta1'y '£ran.sact:io:1 between accused_.Z\{o'..1'V * H

illjllflid. 0:1 30.12.2308, accused No.2 task the   M

him, at that time, accused N0. 1 is a3;'i1§ged' 19 fcxave  'fi§.«t: 

iJ3.j13.re:d. The fust i11f0r1:::1a1:i.o11V was at ;! '§J0u1«. 

p.m., 011 30.12.2008.
4. Pram what 13:3? b'?&11'  1_"1aj;5£"fi_tf=d  thé first

irlfoxmation, it is not posflsiblaa ic_)_  ifbj; the above

4 acts the accuséd  the:':iééit':i;ef they would

have been held' éf $31: (?fi€j.I}.(:'i:' ;:>i2I1isI1".éibIe under Section
302 IPC. VT  §§1at there is prima facie
case agéiinsi 'péiitisn§ér$"'f«:§:f'v----a1} hffcnce punishable under

Secfion 3{}i2--L:PC. V"E'11éf§:fo§é:§LV"'p5.e%:iti0ners are entitleci for a

_  'undsr  438 C.r.P.C.

  rgasult, f pass the follow:i11g:~
ORDER

“‘«.T11e,__vpcti.iviéns am accepted.

x {L If petitioners are arrested ‘fay Thirthahafii Police in

V Etflnnacfien with Crime I\Eo.319f 21308, the}? shalt be

released on bail on thefir ezxecutixxg bonds 1 fl

Rs.10,0{}0/~ each and 0fi’en’11§;: like
sum.

if. The petitioncm for the pfigjisgse oAi”i:1Vssti§_gaAti§:s’11–VV.s}1;:;t}1
appaar befare 3’I1i1*tl1a}1a]l_i wfgencver
cafled upon to do _ _

Hf. T116 petiti0I1-srs s112a’1′[}’1VA tamper with

pmsscuticsn v:it11esses;;- . if

IV. This 0;Ii’é§’ V_1″c:fi*’VV :5: paricrd of two
mcs1:”rh$ ‘time, petitioner 31131}
and seek regular
Jtfithxe learned Magistrate shall
CO.”I}S1′(i*’f:’_l.” *fheVV’;3 p.’i};Viic:–:«fii§:fiVwithout being i11fluc11c€d by
the gbst_§iV’.2§titJ1:S rfiadé. in this order. Kw
‘ _____

Judge

. _ Isgwrq