High Court Kerala High Court

Kushi vs State Of Kerala on 11 March, 2010

Kerala High Court
Kushi vs State Of Kerala on 11 March, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl.MC.No. 852 of 2010()


1. KUSHI, SREEJA BHAVANAM,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA,
                       ...       Respondent

2. DEEPA, DAKSHINI HOUSE,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.GEORGE VARGHESE(PERUMPALLIKUTTIYIL)

                For Respondent  :SRI.JACOB P.ALEX

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR

 Dated :11/03/2010

 O R D E R
          M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,J.

           ------------------------------------------
            CRL.M.C.NO.852 OF 2010
           ------------------------------------------
            Dated 11th March 2010


                         O R D E R

Petitioner is the accused and

second respondent the de facto complainant

in C.C.671/2007 now pending as L.P.121/2009

on the file Judicial First Class

Magistrate-I, Chengannur. Second respondent

filed Annexure-1 complaint which was sent

for investigation under Section 156(3) and

crime No.186/2007 of Chengannur police

station, registered for the offences under

Section 498 A read with Section 34 of

Indian Penal Code on Annexure-2 final

report and Annexure-3 final report was

filed. Cognizance was taken for the offence

under Section 498 A against the petitioner.

Petition is filed under Section 482 of Code

Crmc 852/10
2

of Criminal Procedure to quash the proceedings

contending that entire matrimonial disputes

were settled amicably. Second respondent

appeared through a counsel and filed an

affidavit stating that entire matrimonial

disputes were settled and consequent to the

settlement, she has no subsisting grievance

against the petitioners and she has no

objection for quashing the proceedings.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the

petitioner, second respondent and learned

Public Prosecutor were heard.

           3. As    held  by  the  Apex  court  in

B.S.Joshi      and others  v. State of Haryana and

another      (2003(4)  SCC  675)  when matrimonial

disputes were settled amicably, it is not in

the interest of justice to continue the

prosecution, standing on technicalities.

Crmc 852/10
3

Affidavit filed by the wife, second respondent,

establishes that entire matrimonial disputes

were settled amicably. In such circumstances,

it is not in the interest of justice to

continue the prosecution.

Petition is allowed. L.P.121/2009 on the

file of Judicial First Class Magistrate-I,

Chengannur is quashed.

M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,
JUDGE.

uj.