High Court Kerala High Court

The Cannanore Co-Operative … vs The Commissiioner Of Central … on 8 October, 2010

Kerala High Court
The Cannanore Co-Operative … vs The Commissiioner Of Central … on 8 October, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WA.No. 1704 of 2010()


1. THE CANNANORE CO-OPERATIVE SPINNING
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE COMMISSIIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER(PREVENTIVE)

3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL EXCISE,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.M.SREEDHARAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble the Chief Justice MR.J.CHELAMESWAR
The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON

 Dated :08/10/2010

 O R D E R
        J.Chelameswar, C.J. & P.R.Ramachandra Menon, J.
                    ------------------------------------------
                        W.A. No. 1704 of 2010
                    ------------------------------------------
                 Dated this the 8th day of October, 2010

                               JUDGMENT

Ramachandra Menon, J.

The appellant/petitioner approached this Court disputing

the liability to satisfy ‘interest’, to the tune of `3,48,802/- as

claimed in Ext.P2 notice, raising many a contention. The writ

petition was admitted and an interim order of stay was granted by

the learned Single Judge. Thereafter, the respondents filed a

counter affidavit and an application to vacate the interim order,

pointing out the merits involved. The matter was considered by the

learned Single Judge who passed the impugned order dated 1st June,

2010 observing that the circumstances did not necessitate to have the

interim order extended any further. It is against the said order that

the appellant has filed the present writ appeal.

2. The only contention of the appellant appears to be

that, the appellant/petitioner is entitled to have the benefit of

W.A.No.1704 of 2010

– 2 –

interim stay, till the writ petition is finally heard and disposed of.

Absolutely nothing has been stated in the writ appeal with regard to

the merits involved or as to the eligibility of the appellant to have

sustained the plea with regard to payment of interest. We do not

find any illegality or impropriety in the order passed and impugned

in the writ appeal.

Interference is declined and the writ appeal is dismissed.

J.Chelameswar,
Chief Justice

P.R.Ramachandra Menon,
Judge

vns