Office Of The Official Liquidator vs Nil on 22 October, 2008

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
EATED THIS THE 22" may 09 ocroaan 2oQa ,
BEFORE ' }.
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICEWB_V xAGA§gTHxA_ Q"
C.A.NO.514KgQg§ 'A %
IN *2';
co.9.NQ;$/19?9

BETWEEN

------u....------

O?FICE 0? Tag OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR
HIGH COURT 0: KARNA$AKA; 4*" FLOOR
D & F'wIuQ,¥KENnRI¥A~sAnAN
KORAMRNGALA, 8ANGRLORE--560 034

.«» ' , *5' * ...APPLICRNT

~.¢ (Bi SRI"Q$EPAK é SR1 V JAXARAM, ADVS.,)

. . . RESPONDENT

THIS APFLICATION IS FILED UNDER SESCTION

.”g§6é ow THE CGMEANIES ACT, 1956 R/W RULES 11{b}
_ AND 298 0? THE COMPANIES (COURT) RULES, 1956

PRRYING TO APPOINT RN AUDITOR TO AUDIT THE
ACCOUNTS OF THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR FOR THE

– 2 u

HALF YEAR ENDING 31.3.200 AND f§:gQja:3 u.”

REMUNERATION AND ETC., ‘ “»

wars APPLICATION camzfia 7o&T EUR .oRfi$R§

THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE ram FQLLOWIfiG; M% 5
Q§§ég» V . _ . W
Auditor’s rep¢§£”a¢%e§fiéd{r:ppditor’s fee
is fixed in terms §f.£he §%déi[§%1éd 8.6.2007

passed in QiR $6.2il/fiQb7.:.
Réquifiem§fi£z of .Sq¢fion 462(5) Of the
Companie$ A¢t i$_diSfiénsed with.

‘.”»BcQdrfiifigly, the application is allowed.

Sd/-§__
Iudqe

u”,5fiv