WI-
EN THE HIGH COURT 0? KARNATAKA A? BAx§gL§Rfig »
BAKED THIS THE 13″ DAY OF JANUARY :oQ9 “”
pREsaNr~
THE HON’BLE MR.JUsTIcE”x.ééEEBfiA§’RAQ * VT
Axré –. _
THE HON’BLE MR,JUsT:CEfs,N,sA$YAwA3Ay&NA
M$A’m§-?395fQf<20§4(}*E)
BETWEEN .v ~~-'='
1 REKHANATHfRAxv; "W
S/o5LoKEsH"RA1=;af<
29 YBARsi_ '. 4}.
KEDIMGIMOGR3 HQUSE ”
?KOBI%2*€ILEAGE.’. .
BELLARE,”S8LLIAaThLUK
* ” ‘,’af»’*.”«* . A?PELLRNT
{By Sri @’§’sHARArH”éow2A, s.H.AMAREsH, ADVS)
% % 2
_ i AS$iVAfi§H§R RA:
33 ¥EARs
SfUrSANJEEVA SHETTY
.Rfic OTOLI R0333
._ MSRULYA VILLAGE AND POST
‘v, SULLIA TALUK
2 THE DIVISIGNAE MANAGER
THE SNITEB INDIR INSURANCE CO LTD
RAM BBAVAN COMQLEX
MANGALGRE
3 RITESH NAIK
-3-
againet the moped. The petitioner susteined
fracture of right clavicle, fracture of~m§n§ible«
and fracture of 3 teeth and loss of_2 teetn;fl Theul%
petitioner is aged about :é2 lyears Vworking” an
securityn guard at the vtime’,ofu acci$e§t;~ E’Thég
income of the petitionerk to ‘be’,ésoeeéed at’
Rs.2,300/– per month: the injury ceused and the
disability, if any; uoee not eifeot the avocation
and income of the Qetitionefigni Z ‘
g,m rug –i;§§s§¢§§me§fii re: the facts and
evidence,-fl the * petitioner is entitled to
comyeneaticwi or tRéi4§}§Co;– for pain and agony,
Rs.l5;Q08/?=_for loos of amenities and future
i”diScoflfort, if fink, on account of the disability,
2¥.é3uag§igs£}médica1 bills produced for R5.33,618/-
the petitioner is granted Rs.4O,O0O/W for medical
‘»,and inoidental expenses and Rs.10,00Q/– for loss
” not “income during laid–up §eriod. in all, the
éetitioner is entitled to Rs.1,00,000f– a3
against §s.71,6G$/* awarded by the Tribunal. The
enhanced compensaticn shall be paid by fi§%f “3§
insurer of the car.
Nd/-