High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

Mamtesh Kaur & Another vs State Of Punjab & Others on 4 August, 2008

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Mamtesh Kaur & Another vs State Of Punjab & Others on 4 August, 2008
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH



                         Criminal Miscellaneous No.M-19398 of 2008
                                      Date of Decision: August 04, 2008


Mamtesh Kaur & Another
                                                                  .....PETITIONER(S)

                                    VERSUS



State of Punjab & Others
                                                              .....RESPONDENT(S)
                                .      .      .


CORAM:          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA


PRESENT: -      Mr. Arvind Thakur,                     Advocate,         for
                the petitioners.


                                .      .         .


AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral)

                The      petition          has        been        filed     by       the

petitioners      with     the       assertions             that     they       are    of

marriageable age and got married, however, against the

desires of respondent Nos.4 to 7. Because the

respondents are threatening the life and liberty of the

petitioners, a complaint was made vide Annexure P-5,

however, no action has been taken.

Learned counsel has also contended that

father of Manjit Singh (petitioner No.2) has been

picked up by the Station House Officer, Police Station,

Ghannur, District Patiala, which is a clear abuse of

process of law.

The circumstances constrain me to issue
Civil Writ Petition No.M-19398 of 2008 [2]

directions to the Senior Superintendent of Police,

Patiala (respondent No.2) to have an enquiry conducted

into the allegations made in the petition, a copy

whereof would be supplied alongwith a copy of the

order.

Ordered accordingly.

The enquiry be concluded within 15 days.

In case the apprehension of the petitioners is found

reasonable, protection of their life and liberty would

be ensured.

Petition is disposed of accordingly.



                                                           (AJAI LAMBA)
August 04, 2008                                               JUDGE
avin