High Court Karnataka High Court

Shruthi vs The President Claretian Society on 27 January, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Shruthi vs The President Claretian Society on 27 January, 2009
Author: K.Sreedhar Rao S.N.Satyanarayana


The Doctor has stated that the total body oioaoietyts

assessed at 30% on account of the

occurrence of the accident, negfigence ‘eovefage or ‘

insurance are not in dispute.

2. The notional of is”

assessed at Rs.2 V::T_i§.eV””1.1_otio1ia1e idcome is
assessed almost 13 age of the
petitioner. benefit of
V3 multiples to be
deducjtedd; * would apply. The
incomeloss to disabiiity is 630 /– p.m.

_ _ 3. Ifie-vappfeciation of the facts and evidence,

.”<petit:ioner for Rsx-10000 for pain and

bills are produced for Rs.2000/-

The is granted 10,000 towards medical and

iticidental expenses, Rs.50,000/– towards loss of

«.a;netiities and discomfort, Rs.50,000 for loss of

0% prospects. The future loss of income on

V account of disability is Rs.1,13,400/~ (Rs.630( income) x

12 (months) 1: 15 (mllitiplier). In an is

entitled for total compensatigz; of / as

against Rs. 33,500 awarded

enhanced compensafion;TV_th§ iI1fert§stVpa§f§-fijflie-. .15 £596 p.$.'

from the date of petition date

Iudge
Iudge