IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Con.Case(C).No. 1387 of 2010(S)
1. CHINCHU SHAJ, D/O.SHAJAHAN,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. JAYACHANDRAN, AGE NOT KNOWN,
... Respondent
For Petitioner :SRI.T.R.RAJAN
For Respondent :SRI.M.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR
The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN
Dated :30/11/2010
O R D E R
S. SIRI JAGAN, J.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
C.O.C. No. 1387 of 2010
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dated this the 30th day of November, 2010
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner complains of non-compliance with Annexure
A2 judgment. In that judgment, I directed the Vice Chancellor of
the University to pass orders on Ext.P7. On 18.11.2010, I passed
the following interim order:
“The learned counsel for the University submits that, orders as
directed in Annexure A2 judgment has been passed as early as
on 06.10.2010. The counsel for the petitioner submits that, the
petitioner has not been forwarded with a copy of the same. The
learned standing counsel for the University hands over a copy
of the said order to the learned counsel for the petitioner. The
counsel for the petitioner seeks time to verify.”
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, that is
not a proper order because the same is signed by the Registrar
and not by the Vice Chancellor. But on a reading of the said
order, I find that, the same is titled “proceedings of the Vice
Chancellor” and it is stated therein that the orders passed by the
Vice Chancellor has been communicated to the petitioner
although the same is signed by the Registrar. That being so, the
remedy of the petitioner lies in challenging that order
appropriately. Without prejudice to that right, this contempt
case is closed.
S. SIRI JAGAN
JUDGE
shg/