IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(Crl.).No. 239 of 2009(S)
1. ABBAS KUNJUMON, ORUVIL HOUSE,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ERUMAPETTY
... Respondent
2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
3. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,THRISSUR,
4. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, KERALA STATE
5. AJESH,S/O.KOVALAN, PARAKKAL HOUSE,
For Petitioner :SRI.JOSEPH SEBASTIAN PURAYIDAM
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT
The Hon'ble MRS. Justice M.C.HARI RANI
Dated :03/07/2009
O R D E R
R.BASANT & M.C.HARIRANI, JJ.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
W.P.(Crl).239 No.of 2009
----------------------------------------
Dated this the 3rd day of July 2009
J U D G M E N T
BASANT,J
The petitioner has come to this court with this petition for
issue of a writ of habeas corpus to search, trace and produce his
daughter Amani, a student of the plus two class, who has already
crossed the age of 18 years It is alleged that she has been taken
away by the 5th respondent.
2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, the
learned counsel for the petitioner submits, and the learned
Government Pleader endorses the submission, that the alleged
detenu Amani was traced by the police and was produced before
the learned Magistrate having jurisdiction. Thereafter, after
ascertaining the response of the alleged detenu, the learned
Magistrate has permitted her to go with the petitioner herein,
submits the learned counsel.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, in
these circumstances, the petitioner does not want to seek any
further directions from this court. If anyone has grievance about
W.P.Crl.No.239/09 2
the order of the learned Magistrate permitting the alleged
detenu to go with the petitioner, it is for such persons to
challenge the said direction of the learned Magistrate in
accordance with law.
4. In the light of the submission by the learned counsel
for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader, we
accept that no further directions are necessary in this writ
petition. 5th respondent who has already been served is not
present before court.
5. This writ petition is, in these circumstances, dismissed
as agreed.
(R.BASANT, JUDGE)
(M.C.HARIRANI, JUDGE)
jsr
W.P.Crl.No.239/09 3
W.P.Crl.No.239/09 4
R.BASANT & M.C.HARIRANI, JJ.
.No. of 200
ORDER/JUDGMENT
18/06/2009